Balancing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section
Liz Baxter, Sarah Davies
Abstract
Liz Baxter, Sarah Davies
Abstract
Despite a consensus that rates of caesarean section are too high and should be reduced, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) appears to be declining. This article explores the possible reasons for this, as well as examining the factors that may influence a woman's decision about future mode and place of birth following a previous caesarean section. There is a need for research exploring women's reasons for choosing VBAC or elective repeat caesarean section and the way in which risk is communicated.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Despite a consensus that rates of caesarean section are too high and should be reduced, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) appears to be declining. This article explores the possible reasons for this, as well as examining the factors that may influence a woman's decision about future mode and place of birth following a previous caesarean section. There is a need for research exploring women's reasons for choosing VBAC or elective repeat caesarean section and the way in which risk is communicated.
Key concepts: Caesarean section, Vaginal birth, Childbirth, Obstetrics, Medicine, Section (typography), Elective caesarean section, Pregnancy