2014Journal of Clinical &amp Experimental ResearchRequires access

Comparative study of oral and trans nasal midazolam as a sedative premedication in paediatric patients

Dipak L Raval, Tahir Gunga

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Premedication in pediatric patient before induction of anaesthesia is of vital importance. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine which produces anxiolytic, amnestic, hypnotic and skeletal muscle relaxant effects. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, acceptability, level of sedation and ease of administration of midazolam by using oral and trans nasal route as a sedative premedication in paediatric patient. Materials and Methods: Sixty paediatric patients of ASA grade I or II, aged 2-10 years, undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received oral syrup midazolam 0.5mg/kg and Group II received nasal spray midazolam 0.25mg/kg. Demographic profile, response to drug administration, level of sedation, separation from parents, venipuncture, induction and postoperative recovery scores were noted and statistically analyzed. Results: The study shows that children receiving oral midazolam has better acceptability (group I, 76.66%) than when administered through intranasal route (group II, 53.33%). Sedation score were better at 20 min. in intranasal group (3.06 versus 2.96) than oral group. Post anesthesia recovery scores were similar in both groups. Conclusion: On the basis of our study, we concluded that oral syrup midazolam has better acceptability while intranasal spray midazolam has slightly faster onset without prolonging recovery from anesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Premedication in pediatric patient before induction of anaesthesia is of vital importance. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine which produces anxiolytic, amnestic, hypnotic and skeletal muscle relaxant effects. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, acceptability, level of sedation and ease of administration of midazolam by using oral and trans nasal route as a sedative premedication in paediatric patient. Materials and Methods: Sixty paediatric patients of ASA grade I or II, aged 2-10 years, undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received oral syrup midazolam 0.5mg/kg and Group II received nasal spray midazolam 0.25mg/kg. Demographic profile, response to drug administration, level of sedation, separation from parents, venipuncture, induction and postoperative recovery scores were noted and statistically analyzed. Results: The study shows that children receiving oral midazolam has better acceptability (group I, 76.66%) than when administered through intranasal route (group II, 53.33%). Sedation score were better at 20 min. in intranasal group (3.06 versus 2.96) than oral group. Post anesthesia recovery scores were similar in both groups. Conclusion: On the basis of our study, we concluded that oral syrup midazolam has better acceptability while intranasal spray midazolam has slightly faster onset without prolonging recovery from anesthesia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Premedication in pediatric patient before induction of anaesthesia is of vital importance. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine which produces anxiolytic, amnestic, hypnotic and skeletal muscle relaxant effects. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, acceptability, level of sedation and ease of administration of midazolam by using oral and trans nasal route as a sedative premedication in paediatric patient. Materials and Methods: Sixty paediatric patients of ASA grade I or II, aged 2-10 years, undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received oral syrup midazolam 0.5mg/kg and Group II received nasal spray midazolam 0.25mg/kg. Demographic profile, response to drug administration, level of sedation, separation from parents, venipuncture, induction and postoperative recovery scores were noted and statistically analyzed. Results: The study shows that children receiving oral midazolam has better acceptability (group I, 76.66%) than when administered through intranasal route (group II, 53.33%). Sedation score were better at 20 min. in intranasal group (3.06 versus 2.96) than oral group. Post anesthesia recovery scores were similar in both groups. Conclusion: On the basis of our study, we concluded that oral syrup midazolam has better acceptability while intranasal spray midazolam has slightly faster onset without prolonging recovery from anesthesia.

Key concepts: Premedication, Sedative, Midazolam, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sedation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of oral and trans nasal midazolam as a sedative premedication in paediatric patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens