1997Journal of Sustainable AgricultureRequires access

The Impact of Living and Cover Crop Mulch Systems on Pests and Yields of Snap Beans and Cabbage

John B. Masiunas, Darin M. Eastburn, V. Mwaja, C. E. Eastman

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Living or cover crop mulches may reduce pesticide and fertilizer use while protecting the soil. Three systems in cabbage [hairy vetch cover crop mulch (HV), cereal rye cover crop mulch (CR), and a perennial ryegrass living mulch (PR)] or two systems in snap beans (CR and PR) were compared to conventional fall-tillage with trifluralin (CT). The CR with fall-planted rye was best for suppressing weeds. None of the mulches adequately suppressed cabbage insect pests. In 1992, hairy vetch regrowth reduced cabbage growth and yield. Snap bean yields were reduced in the CR system. The mulches are more management intensive and variable than the CT. CR was the most promising mulch, but further research is needed to develop approaches that prevent snap bean yield loss.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Living or cover crop mulches may reduce pesticide and fertilizer use while protecting the soil. Three systems in cabbage [hairy vetch cover crop mulch (HV), cereal rye cover crop mulch (CR), and a perennial ryegrass living mulch (PR)] or two systems in snap beans (CR and PR) were compared to conventional fall-tillage with trifluralin (CT). The CR with fall-planted rye was best for suppressing weeds. None of the mulches adequately suppressed cabbage insect pests. In 1992, hairy vetch regrowth reduced cabbage growth and yield. Snap bean yields were reduced in the CR system. The mulches are more management intensive and variable than the CT. CR was the most promising mulch, but further research is needed to develop approaches that prevent snap bean yield loss.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Living or cover crop mulches may reduce pesticide and fertilizer use while protecting the soil. Three systems in cabbage [hairy vetch cover crop mulch (HV), cereal rye cover crop mulch (CR), and a perennial ryegrass living mulch (PR)] or two systems in snap beans (CR and PR) were compared to conventional fall-tillage with trifluralin (CT). The CR with fall-planted rye was best for suppressing weeds. None of the mulches adequately suppressed cabbage insect pests. In 1992, hairy vetch regrowth reduced cabbage growth and yield. Snap bean yields were reduced in the CR system. The mulches are more management intensive and variable than the CT. CR was the most promising mulch, but further research is needed to develop approaches that prevent snap bean yield loss.

Key concepts: Cover crop, Mulch, Agronomy, Crop, Tillage, Yield (engineering), Biology, Crop yield

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact of Living and Cover Crop Mulch Systems on Pests and Yields of Snap Beans and Cabbage — Research Paper | ScholarLens