Custom Ocular Prosthesis in Children: How Often is a Change Required?
Deepa Raizada, Kuldeep Raizada, Milind N. Naik, Ramesh K. Murthy, Anirban Bhaduri, Santosh G Honavar
Abstract
Deepa Raizada, Kuldeep Raizada, Milind N. Naik, Ramesh K. Murthy, Anirban Bhaduri, Santosh G Honavar
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications, outcome and replacement schedule of custom ocular prostheses (COP) in children. METHODS: Retrospective review evaluating indications, outcome and replacement schedule of COP in children (≤16 years). RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty (330) children were fitted with COP. With average follow-up of 18.05 months (range 1-50 months), 136(41.2%) children needed replacement/modification of the prosthesis. Information regarding indications for replacement/modification of prosthesis was available in 125 cases. Indications included enophthalmic prosthesis in 34(27.2%), prosthesis rotation within the socket in 25(20%), loose fit in 16(12.8%), decentration of the cornea in 15(12%), color touch up in 13(10.4%), lost prosthesis in 8(6.4%), cosmetically significant ptosis in 2(1.6%), replacement following implant exchange surgery in 2(1.6%) and combination of above factors in 10(8%). Time for replacement/modification of prosthesis was assessed in 3 age groups. In ≤3 years, 47% (36 out of 76) children underwent replacement/modification at a mean duration of 18 months (range 3-39 months) from the date of prosthesis fitting. In the 3-12 years age group, 43% (80 out of 184) underwent replacement/modification at 21 months (range 2-48 months); and in the 12-16 year age group, 29% (20 out of 70) underwent replacement/modification of prosthesis at a mean duration of 26 months (range 3-50 months). CONCLUSION: A change of prosthesis is required between 18-26 months following prosthesis placement in children. Over an average of 18 months, a change in the prosthesis was required in 41%, with the youngest age group having the highest exchange rate (47%), and the oldest group the lowest (29%).
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the indications, outcome and replacement schedule of custom ocular prostheses (COP) in children. METHODS: Retrospective review evaluating indications, outcome and replacement schedule of COP in children (≤16 years). RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty (330) children were fitted with COP. With average follow-up of 18.05 months (range 1-50 months), 136(41.2%) children needed replacement/modification of the prosthesis. Information regarding indications for replacement/modification of prosthesis was available in 125 cases. Indications included enophthalmic prosthesis in 34(27.2%), prosthesis rotation within the socket in 25(20%), loose fit in 16(12.8%), decentration of the cornea in 15(12%), color touch up in 13(10.4%), lost prosthesis in 8(6.4%), cosmetically significant ptosis in 2(1.6%), replacement following implant exchange surgery in 2(1.6%) and combination of above factors in 10(8%). Time for replacement/modification of prosthesis was assessed in 3 age groups. In ≤3 years, 47% (36 out of 76) children underwent replacement/modification at a mean duration of 18 months (range 3-39 months) from the date of prosthesis fitting. In the 3-12 years age group, 43% (80 out of 184) underwent replacement/modification at 21 months (range 2-48 months); and in the 12-16 year age group, 29% (20 out of 70) underwent replacement/modification of prosthesis at a mean duration of 26 months (range 3-50 months). CONCLUSION: A change of prosthesis is required between 18-26 months following prosthesis placement in children. Over an average of 18 months, a change in the prosthesis was required in 41%, with the youngest age group having the highest exchange rate (47%), and the oldest group the lowest (29%).
Key concepts: Medicine, Prosthesis, Implant, Surgery, Ocular prosthesis