2015arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Statistical approaches to reconstructing genome evolution: beyond the Eukaryote-Prokaryote dichotomy

Arellano Dav, Éric Tannier, Vincent Daubin, Bastien Boussau

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Although the role of gene transfer is well recognized in the evolution of bacteria, it is generally assumed that it has had less inuence among eukaryotes. To explore this hypothesis we compare the dynamics of genome evolution in two groups of organisms: Cyanobacteria and Fungi. Ancestral genomes are inferred in both clades using two types of methods. First, Count, a gene tree unaware method that models gene duplications, gains and losses to explain the observed numbers of genes present in a genome. Second, ALE, a more recent gene tree-aware method that reconciles gene trees with a species tree using a model of gene duplication, loss, and transfer. We compare their merits and their ability to quantify the role of transfers, and the impact of taxonomic sampling. We present what we believe is compelling evidence that gene transfer plays a signicant role in the evolution of Fungi.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although the role of gene transfer is well recognized in the evolution of bacteria, it is generally assumed that it has had less inuence among eukaryotes. To explore this hypothesis we compare the dynamics of genome evolution in two groups of organisms: Cyanobacteria and Fungi. Ancestral genomes are inferred in both clades using two types of methods. First, Count, a gene tree unaware method that models gene duplications, gains and losses to explain the observed numbers of genes present in a genome. Second, ALE, a more recent gene tree-aware method that reconciles gene trees with a species tree using a model of gene duplication, loss, and transfer. We compare their merits and their ability to quantify the role of transfers, and the impact of taxonomic sampling. We present what we believe is compelling evidence that gene transfer plays a signicant role in the evolution of Fungi.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although the role of gene transfer is well recognized in the evolution of bacteria, it is generally assumed that it has had less inuence among eukaryotes. To explore this hypothesis we compare the dynamics of genome evolution in two groups of organisms: Cyanobacteria and Fungi. Ancestral genomes are inferred in both clades using two types of methods. First, Count, a gene tree unaware method that models gene duplications, gains and losses to explain the observed numbers of genes present in a genome. Second, ALE, a more recent gene tree-aware method that reconciles gene trees with a species tree using a model of gene duplication, loss, and transfer. We compare their merits and their ability to quantify the role of transfers, and the impact of taxonomic sampling. We present what we believe is compelling evidence that gene transfer plays a signicant role in the evolution of Fungi.

Key concepts: Prokaryote, Eukaryote, Horizontal gene transfer, Genome, Biology, Evolutionary biology, Gene, Gene duplication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statistical approaches to reconstructing genome evolution: beyond the Eukaryote-Prokaryote dichotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens