2012Unpublished venueRequires access

NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION

Chris Freeman, Luc Soete

Open publisher page 1,397 citations

Abstract

As we have already seen in Part One, Friedrich List criticized the classical economists for giving insufficient attention to science, technology and skills in the growth of nations. His book on The National System of Political Economy (1841), might just as well have been called &s;The National System of Innovation&s;. The main concern of List was with the problem of Germany overtaking England and for underdeveloped countries (as Germany then was in relation to England), he advocated not only protection of infant industries but a broad range of policies designed to accelerate or to make possible, industrialization and economic growth. Most of these policies were concerned with learning about new technology and applying it. He clearly anticipated many contemporary theories on &s;national systems of innovation&s; (Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993; Mjeset. 1992).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As we have already seen in Part One, Friedrich List criticized the classical economists for giving insufficient attention to science, technology and skills in the growth of nations. His book on The National System of Political Economy (1841), might just as well have been called &s;The National System of Innovation&s;. The main concern of List was with the problem of Germany overtaking England and for underdeveloped countries (as Germany then was in relation to England), he advocated not only protection of infant industries but a broad range of policies designed to accelerate or to make possible, industrialization and economic growth. Most of these policies were concerned with learning about new technology and applying it. He clearly anticipated many contemporary theories on &s;national systems of innovation&s; (Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993; Mjeset. 1992).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1397 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As we have already seen in Part One, Friedrich List criticized the classical economists for giving insufficient attention to science, technology and skills in the growth of nations. His book on The National System of Political Economy (1841), might just as well have been called &s;The National System of Innovation&s;. The main concern of List was with the problem of Germany overtaking England and for underdeveloped countries (as Germany then was in relation to England), he advocated not only protection of infant industries but a broad range of policies designed to accelerate or to make possible, industrialization and economic growth. Most of these policies were concerned with learning about new technology and applying it. He clearly anticipated many contemporary theories on &s;national systems of innovation&s; (Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993; Mjeset. 1992).

Key concepts: Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens