1994•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Does Labour Market Rationing Entail (Involuntary) Unemployment

Michel R. De Vroey

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This article argues in favor of drawing a distinction between the concepts of labour rationing and unemployment, the former referring to the occurrence of excess supply in a given labour market, the latter to job-waiting activity. In a first part, the literature on the possible consequences of labour rationing is surveyed. In a second part, a series of concepts and definitions which enable to single out the conditions under which labour rationing can result in involuntary unemployment, are put forward. Lucas’ widely accepted view that some job alternatives are always available will thereby be challenged. In part three, the relationship between labour rationing and (involuntary) unemployment is examined in the context of three regimes, a Walrasian, a Smithian and a Keynesian economy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article argues in favor of drawing a distinction between the concepts of labour rationing and unemployment, the former referring to the occurrence of excess supply in a given labour market, the latter to job-waiting activity. In a first part, the literature on the possible consequences of labour rationing is surveyed. In a second part, a series of concepts and definitions which enable to single out the conditions under which labour rationing can result in involuntary unemployment, are put forward. Lucas’ widely accepted view that some job alternatives are always available will thereby be challenged. In part three, the relationship between labour rationing and (involuntary) unemployment is examined in the context of three regimes, a Walrasian, a Smithian and a Keynesian economy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article argues in favor of drawing a distinction between the concepts of labour rationing and unemployment, the former referring to the occurrence of excess supply in a given labour market, the latter to job-waiting activity. In a first part, the literature on the possible consequences of labour rationing is surveyed. In a second part, a series of concepts and definitions which enable to single out the conditions under which labour rationing can result in involuntary unemployment, are put forward. Lucas’ widely accepted view that some job alternatives are always available will thereby be challenged. In part three, the relationship between labour rationing and (involuntary) unemployment is examined in the context of three regimes, a Walrasian, a Smithian and a Keynesian economy.

Key concepts: Rationing, Unemployment, Economics, Involuntary unemployment, Context (archaeology), Labour economics, Labour supply, Keynesian economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does Labour Market Rationing Entail (Involuntary) Unemployment — Research Paper | ScholarLens