2005Geophysical Journal InternationalOpen access

The influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured throughout soil profiles

Monika Hanesch, Robert Scholger

Open full text 163 citations

Abstract

The interpretation of soil susceptibility measurements depends on knowledge of a reference value. This reference value will be influenced by the type of soil. In the present study, data of various soil types, which formed on diverse parent material, are analysed. As the same data set has been used in a soil pollution study, we are able to estimate and exclude the influence of pollution. Susceptibility values of unpolluted soils turn out to significantly depend on the soil type. Chernozem samples yield the highest susceptibility values of the analysed soil types (50–90 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). Cambisol displays intermediate values (20–60 × 10−8 m3 kg−1) and waterlogged soils have the lowest values (5–20 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). The enrichment of topsoil susceptibility (0–20 cm depth) compared to subsoil susceptibility (40–50 cm depth) depends more on the parent material than on the soil type. Given the comparability of soil type and parent material, the values of this study can be used to identify soils with unusual susceptibility values, which may be further analysed in order to pinpoint soil pollution.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The interpretation of soil susceptibility measurements depends on knowledge of a reference value. This reference value will be influenced by the type of soil. In the present study, data of various soil types, which formed on diverse parent material, are analysed. As the same data set has been used in a soil pollution study, we are able to estimate and exclude the influence of pollution. Susceptibility values of unpolluted soils turn out to significantly depend on the soil type. Chernozem samples yield the highest susceptibility values of the analysed soil types (50–90 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). Cambisol displays intermediate values (20–60 × 10−8 m3 kg−1) and waterlogged soils have the lowest values (5–20 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). The enrichment of topsoil susceptibility (0–20 cm depth) compared to subsoil susceptibility (40–50 cm depth) depends more on the parent material than on the soil type. Given the comparability of soil type and parent material, the values of this study can be used to identify soils with unusual susceptibility values, which may be further analysed in order to pinpoint soil pollution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 163 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The interpretation of soil susceptibility measurements depends on knowledge of a reference value. This reference value will be influenced by the type of soil. In the present study, data of various soil types, which formed on diverse parent material, are analysed. As the same data set has been used in a soil pollution study, we are able to estimate and exclude the influence of pollution. Susceptibility values of unpolluted soils turn out to significantly depend on the soil type. Chernozem samples yield the highest susceptibility values of the analysed soil types (50–90 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). Cambisol displays intermediate values (20–60 × 10−8 m3 kg−1) and waterlogged soils have the lowest values (5–20 × 10−8 m3 kg−1). The enrichment of topsoil susceptibility (0–20 cm depth) compared to subsoil susceptibility (40–50 cm depth) depends more on the parent material than on the soil type. Given the comparability of soil type and parent material, the values of this study can be used to identify soils with unusual susceptibility values, which may be further analysed in order to pinpoint soil pollution.

Key concepts: Cambisol, Subsoil, Soil water, Chernozem, Soil science, Soil type, Topsoil, Soil classification

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured throughout soil profiles — Research Paper | ScholarLens