2011TectonicsOpen access

Detrital zircon geochronology of pre‐Tertiary strata in the Tibetan‐Himalayan orogen

George E. Gehrels, Paul Kapp, Peter G. DeCelles, Alex Pullen, Ronald C. Blakey, Amy L. Weislogel, Lin Ding, Jerome H. Guynn, Aaron J. Martin, Nadine McQuarrie, An Yin

Open full text 847 citations

Abstract

Detrital zircon data have recently become available from many different portions of the Tibetan–Himalayan orogen. This study uses 13,441 new or existing U‐Pb ages of zircon crystals from strata in the Lesser Himalayan, Greater Himalayan, and Tethyan sequences in the Himalaya, the Lhasa, Qiangtang, and Nan Shan–Qilian Shan–Altun Shan terranes in Tibet, and platformal strata of the Tarim craton to constrain changes in provenance through time. These constraints provide information about the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Tibet–Himalaya region during Neoproterozoic to Mesozoic time. First‐order conclusions are as follows: (1) Most ages from these crustal fragments are <1.4 Ga, which suggests formation in accretionary orogens involving little pre‐mid‐Proterozoic cratonal material; (2) all fragments south of the Jinsa suture evolved along the northern margin of India as part of a circum‐Gondwana convergent margin system; (3) these Gondwana‐margin assemblages were blanketed by glaciogenic sediment during Carboniferous–Permian time; (4) terranes north of the Jinsa suture formed along the southern margin of the Tarim–North China craton; (5) the northern (Tarim–North China) terranes and Gondwana‐margin assemblages may have been juxtaposed during mid‐Paleozoic time, followed by rifting that formed the Paleo‐Tethys and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; (6) the abundance of Permian–Triassic arc‐derived detritus in the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes is interpreted to record their northward migration across the Paleo‐ and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; and (7) the arrival of India juxtaposed the Tethyan assemblage on its northern margin against the Lhasa terrane, and is the latest in a long history of collisional tectonism.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Detrital zircon data have recently become available from many different portions of the Tibetan–Himalayan orogen. This study uses 13,441 new or existing U‐Pb ages of zircon crystals from strata in the Lesser Himalayan, Greater Himalayan, and Tethyan sequences in the Himalaya, the Lhasa, Qiangtang, and Nan Shan–Qilian Shan–Altun Shan terranes in Tibet, and platformal strata of the Tarim craton to constrain changes in provenance through time. These constraints provide information about the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Tibet–Himalaya region during Neoproterozoic to Mesozoic time. First‐order conclusions are as follows: (1) Most ages from these crustal fragments are <1.4 Ga, which suggests formation in accretionary orogens involving little pre‐mid‐Proterozoic cratonal material; (2) all fragments south of the Jinsa suture evolved along the northern margin of India as part of a circum‐Gondwana convergent margin system; (3) these Gondwana‐margin assemblages were blanketed by glaciogenic sediment during Carboniferous–Permian time; (4) terranes north of the Jinsa suture formed along the southern margin of the Tarim–North China craton; (5) the northern (Tarim–North China) terranes and Gondwana‐margin assemblages may have been juxtaposed during mid‐Paleozoic time, followed by rifting that formed the Paleo‐Tethys and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; (6) the abundance of Permian–Triassic arc‐derived detritus in the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes is interpreted to record their northward migration across the Paleo‐ and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; and (7) the arrival of India juxtaposed the Tethyan assemblage on its northern margin against the Lhasa terrane, and is the latest in a long history of collisional tectonism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 847 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Detrital zircon data have recently become available from many different portions of the Tibetan–Himalayan orogen. This study uses 13,441 new or existing U‐Pb ages of zircon crystals from strata in the Lesser Himalayan, Greater Himalayan, and Tethyan sequences in the Himalaya, the Lhasa, Qiangtang, and Nan Shan–Qilian Shan–Altun Shan terranes in Tibet, and platformal strata of the Tarim craton to constrain changes in provenance through time. These constraints provide information about the paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Tibet–Himalaya region during Neoproterozoic to Mesozoic time. First‐order conclusions are as follows: (1) Most ages from these crustal fragments are <1.4 Ga, which suggests formation in accretionary orogens involving little pre‐mid‐Proterozoic cratonal material; (2) all fragments south of the Jinsa suture evolved along the northern margin of India as part of a circum‐Gondwana convergent margin system; (3) these Gondwana‐margin assemblages were blanketed by glaciogenic sediment during Carboniferous–Permian time; (4) terranes north of the Jinsa suture formed along the southern margin of the Tarim–North China craton; (5) the northern (Tarim–North China) terranes and Gondwana‐margin assemblages may have been juxtaposed during mid‐Paleozoic time, followed by rifting that formed the Paleo‐Tethys and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; (6) the abundance of Permian–Triassic arc‐derived detritus in the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes is interpreted to record their northward migration across the Paleo‐ and Meso‐Tethys ocean basins; and (7) the arrival of India juxtaposed the Tethyan assemblage on its northern margin against the Lhasa terrane, and is the latest in a long history of collisional tectonism.

Key concepts: Geology, Terrane, Gondwana, Paleontology, Craton, Zircon, Fibrous joint, Geochronology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detrital zircon geochronology of pre‐Tertiary strata in the Tibetan‐Himalayan orogen — Research Paper | ScholarLens