2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Dependability assessment for decentralized systems

H. Hecht, Myron J. Hecht

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Conventional dependability measures, such as reliability or availability, assume that the equipment characterized by the measure is either operational or has failed. This dichotomy does not hold for decentralized or distributed systems because these can operate in modes in which partial or degraded service is furnished. Whether a specific degraded mode should be counted as "operational" or "failed" is a subjective decision, but this decision can make a large difference in the dependability assessment. Examples show that this affects not only numerical reporting, but also the selection of reliability improvements. A weighted averaging of the dependability measures obtained under various failure criteria is seen to be a workable method for reliability assessment that provides much more stable measures than can be obtained by selection of a single failure criterion.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conventional dependability measures, such as reliability or availability, assume that the equipment characterized by the measure is either operational or has failed. This dichotomy does not hold for decentralized or distributed systems because these can operate in modes in which partial or degraded service is furnished. Whether a specific degraded mode should be counted as "operational" or "failed" is a subjective decision, but this decision can make a large difference in the dependability assessment. Examples show that this affects not only numerical reporting, but also the selection of reliability improvements. A weighted averaging of the dependability measures obtained under various failure criteria is seen to be a workable method for reliability assessment that provides much more stable measures than can be obtained by selection of a single failure criterion.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conventional dependability measures, such as reliability or availability, assume that the equipment characterized by the measure is either operational or has failed. This dichotomy does not hold for decentralized or distributed systems because these can operate in modes in which partial or degraded service is furnished. Whether a specific degraded mode should be counted as "operational" or "failed" is a subjective decision, but this decision can make a large difference in the dependability assessment. Examples show that this affects not only numerical reporting, but also the selection of reliability improvements. A weighted averaging of the dependability measures obtained under various failure criteria is seen to be a workable method for reliability assessment that provides much more stable measures than can be obtained by selection of a single failure criterion.>

Key concepts: Dependability, Reliability (semiconductor), Reliability engineering, Computer science, Selection (genetic algorithm), Failure mode and effects analysis, Measure (data warehouse), Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dependability assessment for decentralized systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens