2013•Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesOpen access

Discovery of novel chemoeffectors and rational design of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor specificity

Shuangyu Bi, Daqi Yu, Guangwei Si, Chunxiong Luo, Tongqing Li, Qi Ouyang, Vladimir Jakovljevic, Victor Sourjik, Yuhai Tu, Luhua Lai

Open full text 54 citations

Abstract

Bacterial chemoreceptors mediate chemotactic responses to diverse stimuli. Here, by using an integrated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approach, we screened a large compound library and found eight novel chemoeffectors for the Escherichia coli chemoreceptor Tar. Six of the eight new Tar binding compounds induce attractant responses, and two of them function as antagonists that can bind Tar without inducing downstream signaling. Comparison between the antagonist and attractant binding patterns suggests that the key interactions for chemotaxis signaling are mediated by the hydrogen bonds formed between a donor group in the attractant and the main-chain carbonyls (Y149 and/or Q152) on the α4 helix of Tar. This molecular insight for signaling is verified by converting an antagonist to an attractant when introducing an N-H group into the antagonist to restore the hydrogen bond. Similar signal triggering effect by an O-H group is also confirmed. Our study suggests that the Tar chemoeffector binding pocket may be separated into two functional regions: region I mainly contributes to binding and region II contributes to both binding and signaling. This scenario of binding and signaling suggests that Tar may be rationally designed to respond to a nonnative ligand by altering key residues in region I to strengthen binding with the novel ligand while maintaining the key interactions in region II for signaling. Following this strategy, we have successfully redesigned Tar to respond to l-arginine, a basic amino acid that does not have chemotactic effect for WT Tar, by two site-specific mutations (R69'E and R73'E).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bacterial chemoreceptors mediate chemotactic responses to diverse stimuli. Here, by using an integrated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approach, we screened a large compound library and found eight novel chemoeffectors for the Escherichia coli chemoreceptor Tar. Six of the eight new Tar binding compounds induce attractant responses, and two of them function as antagonists that can bind Tar without inducing downstream signaling. Comparison between the antagonist and attractant binding patterns suggests that the key interactions for chemotaxis signaling are mediated by the hydrogen bonds formed between a donor group in the attractant and the main-chain carbonyls (Y149 and/or Q152) on the α4 helix of Tar. This molecular insight for signaling is verified by converting an antagonist to an attractant when introducing an N-H group into the antagonist to restore the hydrogen bond. Similar signal triggering effect by an O-H group is also confirmed. Our study suggests that the Tar chemoeffector binding pocket may be separated into two functional regions: region I mainly contributes to binding and region II contributes to both binding and signaling. This scenario of binding and signaling suggests that Tar may be rationally designed to respond to a nonnative ligand by altering key residues in region I to strengthen binding with the novel ligand while maintaining the key interactions in region II for signaling. Following this strategy, we have successfully redesigned Tar to respond to l-arginine, a basic amino acid that does not have chemotactic effect for WT Tar, by two site-specific mutations (R69'E and R73'E).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bacterial chemoreceptors mediate chemotactic responses to diverse stimuli. Here, by using an integrated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approach, we screened a large compound library and found eight novel chemoeffectors for the Escherichia coli chemoreceptor Tar. Six of the eight new Tar binding compounds induce attractant responses, and two of them function as antagonists that can bind Tar without inducing downstream signaling. Comparison between the antagonist and attractant binding patterns suggests that the key interactions for chemotaxis signaling are mediated by the hydrogen bonds formed between a donor group in the attractant and the main-chain carbonyls (Y149 and/or Q152) on the α4 helix of Tar. This molecular insight for signaling is verified by converting an antagonist to an attractant when introducing an N-H group into the antagonist to restore the hydrogen bond. Similar signal triggering effect by an O-H group is also confirmed. Our study suggests that the Tar chemoeffector binding pocket may be separated into two functional regions: region I mainly contributes to binding and region II contributes to both binding and signaling. This scenario of binding and signaling suggests that Tar may be rationally designed to respond to a nonnative ligand by altering key residues in region I to strengthen binding with the novel ligand while maintaining the key interactions in region II for signaling. Following this strategy, we have successfully redesigned Tar to respond to l-arginine, a basic amino acid that does not have chemotactic effect for WT Tar, by two site-specific mutations (R69'E and R73'E).

Key concepts: Escherichia coli, Chemoreceptor, Chemotaxis, Biology, Ligand (biochemistry), Bacteria, Rational design, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discovery of novel chemoeffectors and rational design of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor specificity — Research Paper | ScholarLens