The craniofacial morphology of the parents of children with orofacial clefting: a systematic review of cephalometric studies
Grant T McIntyre, Peter Mossey
Abstract
Grant T McIntyre, Peter Mossey
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the cephalometric studies investigating the craniofacial morphology of the parents of children with orofacial clefting (OFC). SEARCH STRATEGY: The search strategy was based on the keywords 'parent', cephalometry', and 'cleft', identifying 17 studies, of which 15 'case/control' studies met the inclusion criteria Statistically significant clinically relevant cephalometric variables from univariate statistical tests and multivariate results were collated and presented unweighted. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The parental craniofacial complex in OFC is distinctive in comparison to the non-cleft population. However, there is insufficient consistency in study designs and results to accurately characterize the parents of children with OFC. Although the craniofacial morphology of the parents of children with CL(P) differs to the parents of children with CP, there is insufficient information to accurately localize these differences.
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the cephalometric studies investigating the craniofacial morphology of the parents of children with orofacial clefting (OFC). SEARCH STRATEGY: The search strategy was based on the keywords 'parent', cephalometry', and 'cleft', identifying 17 studies, of which 15 'case/control' studies met the inclusion criteria Statistically significant clinically relevant cephalometric variables from univariate statistical tests and multivariate results were collated and presented unweighted. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The parental craniofacial complex in OFC is distinctive in comparison to the non-cleft population. However, there is insufficient consistency in study designs and results to accurately characterize the parents of children with OFC. Although the craniofacial morphology of the parents of children with CL(P) differs to the parents of children with CP, there is insufficient information to accurately localize these differences.
Key concepts: Craniofacial, Cephalometry, Univariate, Medicine, Multivariate analysis, Orthodontics, Cephalometric analysis, Population