1981Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior ProcessesRequires access

Contextual conditioning and the US preexposure effect in conditioned fear.

A. G. Baker, Pierre Mercier, Janet Gabel, Patricia Baker

Open publisher page 89 citations

Abstract

A series of five experiments was carried out in which fear of context caused by exposure to shocks was manipulated by signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, signaling the days during which shocks occurred with a session-long stimulus, or switching the context between exposure and the subsequent test. All these manipulations influenced fear of the context in the manner predicted by the Rescorla-Wagner associative model. Following this, all the rats were given conditioning trials with shock and a different discrete stimulus. All preexposure treatments produced consistent and reliable interference with conditioning with the exception of signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, which greatly reduced interference. These results are interpreted as being consistent both with a cognitive explanation of the US exposure effect, which claims that animals learn that shocks are unpredictable during conditioning and this knowledge retards future conditioning when they are predictable, and with an adaptation explanation, which claims that unpredictable shocks produce chronic fear and this fear through either a change in adaptation level or through emotional exhaustion renders the shocks less reinforcing during the conditioning test.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A series of five experiments was carried out in which fear of context caused by exposure to shocks was manipulated by signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, signaling the days during which shocks occurred with a session-long stimulus, or switching the context between exposure and the subsequent test. All these manipulations influenced fear of the context in the manner predicted by the Rescorla-Wagner associative model. Following this, all the rats were given conditioning trials with shock and a different discrete stimulus. All preexposure treatments produced consistent and reliable interference with conditioning with the exception of signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, which greatly reduced interference. These results are interpreted as being consistent both with a cognitive explanation of the US exposure effect, which claims that animals learn that shocks are unpredictable during conditioning and this knowledge retards future conditioning when they are predictable, and with an adaptation explanation, which claims that unpredictable shocks produce chronic fear and this fear through either a change in adaptation level or through emotional exhaustion renders the shocks less reinforcing during the conditioning test.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 89 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A series of five experiments was carried out in which fear of context caused by exposure to shocks was manipulated by signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, signaling the days during which shocks occurred with a session-long stimulus, or switching the context between exposure and the subsequent test. All these manipulations influenced fear of the context in the manner predicted by the Rescorla-Wagner associative model. Following this, all the rats were given conditioning trials with shock and a different discrete stimulus. All preexposure treatments produced consistent and reliable interference with conditioning with the exception of signaling the shocks with a discrete stimulus, which greatly reduced interference. These results are interpreted as being consistent both with a cognitive explanation of the US exposure effect, which claims that animals learn that shocks are unpredictable during conditioning and this knowledge retards future conditioning when they are predictable, and with an adaptation explanation, which claims that unpredictable shocks produce chronic fear and this fear through either a change in adaptation level or through emotional exhaustion renders the shocks less reinforcing during the conditioning test.

Key concepts: Fear conditioning, Conditioning, Classical conditioning, Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Unconditioned stimulus, Measures of conditioned emotional response, Conditioned emotional response

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contextual conditioning and the US preexposure effect in conditioned fear. — Research Paper | ScholarLens