1957Poultry ScienceOpen access

Hybrids of Ring-Necked Pheasants, Turkeys, and Domestic Fowl

V.S. Asmundson, F.W. Lorenz

Open full text 32 citations

Abstract

THE consequences of one or more of a large number of isolating mechanisms are that birds of different species or genera either do not mate or mate only rarely (Dobzhansky, 1951; Riley, 1952; and others). Ecological isolation kept apart the three genera with which we are here concerned for a long time before they were brought together by man. Even then, sexual or psychological isolation has reduced or prevented mating between them. Only between the chicken (Gallus) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) have many natural hybrids been recorded (Suchetet, 1896; Wheeler, 1910; Poll, 1912; Cutler, 1918; Serebrovsky, 1929; Yamashina, 1942). Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are placed in a different family from pheasants and chickens (Friedmann, 1946) and are much larger birds. Despite the additional barrier of size, one natural hybrid of the turkey and pheasant has been reported (Edwards, 1761) but none between the turkey and chicken. The isolating mechanisms may . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

THE consequences of one or more of a large number of isolating mechanisms are that birds of different species or genera either do not mate or mate only rarely (Dobzhansky, 1951; Riley, 1952; and others). Ecological isolation kept apart the three genera with which we are here concerned for a long time before they were brought together by man. Even then, sexual or psychological isolation has reduced or prevented mating between them. Only between the chicken (Gallus) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) have many natural hybrids been recorded (Suchetet, 1896; Wheeler, 1910; Poll, 1912; Cutler, 1918; Serebrovsky, 1929; Yamashina, 1942). Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are placed in a different family from pheasants and chickens (Friedmann, 1946) and are much larger birds. Despite the additional barrier of size, one natural hybrid of the turkey and pheasant has been reported (Edwards, 1761) but none between the turkey and chicken. The isolating mechanisms may . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

THE consequences of one or more of a large number of isolating mechanisms are that birds of different species or genera either do not mate or mate only rarely (Dobzhansky, 1951; Riley, 1952; and others). Ecological isolation kept apart the three genera with which we are here concerned for a long time before they were brought together by man. Even then, sexual or psychological isolation has reduced or prevented mating between them. Only between the chicken (Gallus) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) have many natural hybrids been recorded (Suchetet, 1896; Wheeler, 1910; Poll, 1912; Cutler, 1918; Serebrovsky, 1929; Yamashina, 1942). Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are placed in a different family from pheasants and chickens (Friedmann, 1946) and are much larger birds. Despite the additional barrier of size, one natural hybrid of the turkey and pheasant has been reported (Edwards, 1761) but none between the turkey and chicken. The isolating mechanisms may . . .

Key concepts: Phasianus, Pheasant, Meleagris gallopavo, Biology, Zoology, Fowl, Mating, Galliformes

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hybrids of Ring-Necked Pheasants, Turkeys, and Domestic Fowl — Research Paper | ScholarLens