1988•American AnthropologistRequires access

Addressing Prehistoric Hunting Practices Through Stone Tool Analysis

George Hamley Odell

Open publisher page 77 citations

Abstract

Although archeologists have approached prehistoric hunting practices by studying “projectile points,” use‐wear analyses of nine components spanning 7,500 years of prehistory in the Lower Illinois Valley have shown that this approach is not accurate. The projectile point type is only one of several kinds of lithic artifacts, including other retouched types and debitage, employed in antiquity to tip projectiles. Assemblage comparisons indicate an earlier adoption of bow and arrow technology than most prehistorians have been willing to accept.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although archeologists have approached prehistoric hunting practices by studying “projectile points,” use‐wear analyses of nine components spanning 7,500 years of prehistory in the Lower Illinois Valley have shown that this approach is not accurate. The projectile point type is only one of several kinds of lithic artifacts, including other retouched types and debitage, employed in antiquity to tip projectiles. Assemblage comparisons indicate an earlier adoption of bow and arrow technology than most prehistorians have been willing to accept.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 77 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although archeologists have approached prehistoric hunting practices by studying “projectile points,” use‐wear analyses of nine components spanning 7,500 years of prehistory in the Lower Illinois Valley have shown that this approach is not accurate. The projectile point type is only one of several kinds of lithic artifacts, including other retouched types and debitage, employed in antiquity to tip projectiles. Assemblage comparisons indicate an earlier adoption of bow and arrow technology than most prehistorians have been willing to accept.

Key concepts: Projectile point, Debitage, Prehistory, Archaeology, Assemblage (archaeology), Stone tool, Point (geometry), Spear

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Addressing Prehistoric Hunting Practices Through Stone Tool Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens