1969•Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineRequires access

TESTICULAR FEMINIZATION SYNDROME

Joe Leigh Simpson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

To the Editor .—We read with interest the discussion by Kaplan et al, Inguinal Hernias in Females and the Testicular Feminization Syndrome (Amer J Dis Child 117 :243-251 [Feb] 1969). Two aspects of this problem require, in our opinion, additional comment. First, the existence of the two following clinically and genetically distinct forms of testicular feminization seems established1: (1) a complete form, in which pubescent individuals have well-developed breasts, scanty or absent pubic hair, and normal clitoris, and (2) an incomplete form, in which pubescent individuals have poorly developed breasts, abundant pubic hair, and an enlarged clitoris. The distinction is important because only in the complete form are affected individuals adequately feminized. The same form of testicular feminization is found in the various affected members of a given family, confirming the existence of genetically distinct forms. 1 Second, the contention by Dr. Brennan (p 249) that interpreting buccal smears for

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor .—We read with interest the discussion by Kaplan et al, Inguinal Hernias in Females and the Testicular Feminization Syndrome (Amer J Dis Child 117 :243-251 [Feb] 1969). Two aspects of this problem require, in our opinion, additional comment. First, the existence of the two following clinically and genetically distinct forms of testicular feminization seems established1: (1) a complete form, in which pubescent individuals have well-developed breasts, scanty or absent pubic hair, and normal clitoris, and (2) an incomplete form, in which pubescent individuals have poorly developed breasts, abundant pubic hair, and an enlarged clitoris. The distinction is important because only in the complete form are affected individuals adequately feminized. The same form of testicular feminization is found in the various affected members of a given family, confirming the existence of genetically distinct forms. 1 Second, the contention by Dr. Brennan (p 249) that interpreting buccal smears for

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor .—We read with interest the discussion by Kaplan et al, Inguinal Hernias in Females and the Testicular Feminization Syndrome (Amer J Dis Child 117 :243-251 [Feb] 1969). Two aspects of this problem require, in our opinion, additional comment. First, the existence of the two following clinically and genetically distinct forms of testicular feminization seems established1: (1) a complete form, in which pubescent individuals have well-developed breasts, scanty or absent pubic hair, and normal clitoris, and (2) an incomplete form, in which pubescent individuals have poorly developed breasts, abundant pubic hair, and an enlarged clitoris. The distinction is important because only in the complete form are affected individuals adequately feminized. The same form of testicular feminization is found in the various affected members of a given family, confirming the existence of genetically distinct forms. 1 Second, the contention by Dr. Brennan (p 249) that interpreting buccal smears for

Key concepts: Testicular feminization, Feminization (sociology), Pubic hair, Clitoris, Disorders of sex development, Body hair, Medicine, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TESTICULAR FEMINIZATION SYNDROME — Research Paper | ScholarLens