2012Public Finance ReviewRequires access

Employer-Provided Health Insurance and the Adverse Selection Problem

Marco A. Castañeda, James Marton

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The role of employers in the health insurance market in the United States is substantial, but there is little formal analysis investigating how the introduction of employers affects the structure of equilibrium contracts in the health insurance market. In this article, the authors present and analyze a model of employer-provided health insurance and show that if the labor market is competitive, the equilibrium must be a separating equilibrium, as in the standard model. The key to this result is that insurance companies and employers have similar incentives because health insurance is an important component of total compensation. In addition, the authors show that if workers bargain collectively for employment contracts, the equilibrium can be a separating or a pooling equilibrium, but in any equilibrium, the low risks obtain more insurance than in the standard model and subsidize the insurance premiums of the high risks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of employers in the health insurance market in the United States is substantial, but there is little formal analysis investigating how the introduction of employers affects the structure of equilibrium contracts in the health insurance market. In this article, the authors present and analyze a model of employer-provided health insurance and show that if the labor market is competitive, the equilibrium must be a separating equilibrium, as in the standard model. The key to this result is that insurance companies and employers have similar incentives because health insurance is an important component of total compensation. In addition, the authors show that if workers bargain collectively for employment contracts, the equilibrium can be a separating or a pooling equilibrium, but in any equilibrium, the low risks obtain more insurance than in the standard model and subsidize the insurance premiums of the high risks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of employers in the health insurance market in the United States is substantial, but there is little formal analysis investigating how the introduction of employers affects the structure of equilibrium contracts in the health insurance market. In this article, the authors present and analyze a model of employer-provided health insurance and show that if the labor market is competitive, the equilibrium must be a separating equilibrium, as in the standard model. The key to this result is that insurance companies and employers have similar incentives because health insurance is an important component of total compensation. In addition, the authors show that if workers bargain collectively for employment contracts, the equilibrium can be a separating or a pooling equilibrium, but in any equilibrium, the low risks obtain more insurance than in the standard model and subsidize the insurance premiums of the high risks.

Key concepts: Adverse selection, Risk pool, Auto insurance risk selection, Pooling, General insurance, Key person insurance, Insurance policy, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Employer-Provided Health Insurance and the Adverse Selection Problem — Research Paper | ScholarLens