Dialogue on the Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
David Jacobs, Kathleen A. Getz
Abstract
David Jacobs, Kathleen A. Getz
Abstract
The article presents a response to an earlier article in “Academy of Management Review” regarding the stakeholder theory of the corporation from Thomas Donaldson and Lee Preston. The authors take issue with the foundation of the argument, claiming that the theory loses force and clarity when presented as a descriptive model. The article further discusses the issue of property as a basis for stakeholder theory, and illustrates the instability of this foundation through recent and current legal actions. The authors present other ethical theories that might act as a normative basis for stakeholder theory.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article presents a response to an earlier article in “Academy of Management Review” regarding the stakeholder theory of the corporation from Thomas Donaldson and Lee Preston. The authors take issue with the foundation of the argument, claiming that the theory loses force and clarity when presented as a descriptive model. The article further discusses the issue of property as a basis for stakeholder theory, and illustrates the instability of this foundation through recent and current legal actions. The authors present other ethical theories that might act as a normative basis for stakeholder theory.
Key concepts: Stakeholder theory, Corporation, Normative, Foundation (evidence), Stakeholder, CLARITY, Argument (complex analysis), Sociology