1994•Evaluation & the Health ProfessionsRequires access

Is the Public being Protected? Prevention of Suboptimalmedical Practice Through Training Programs and Credentialing Examinations

Robyn M Tamblyn

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

Governments have traditionally looked to the medical profession for leadership in health planning and have charged the profession with the responsibility of establishing and monitoring standards of medical practice. Training program accreditation and licensure/certification exams have been used as the primary methods of preventing unqualified individuals from entering medical practice. Despite the critical nature of the decision made at the time of licensure/certification, there is no information about the validity of these examinations for predicting subsequent practice and health outcome. In this article, the assumptions implicit in the current use of licensing/certifying examinations are identified, the relevant evidence is reviewed, and the implications of this evidence for current methods of measurement are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Governments have traditionally looked to the medical profession for leadership in health planning and have charged the profession with the responsibility of establishing and monitoring standards of medical practice. Training program accreditation and licensure/certification exams have been used as the primary methods of preventing unqualified individuals from entering medical practice. Despite the critical nature of the decision made at the time of licensure/certification, there is no information about the validity of these examinations for predicting subsequent practice and health outcome. In this article, the assumptions implicit in the current use of licensing/certifying examinations are identified, the relevant evidence is reviewed, and the implications of this evidence for current methods of measurement are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Governments have traditionally looked to the medical profession for leadership in health planning and have charged the profession with the responsibility of establishing and monitoring standards of medical practice. Training program accreditation and licensure/certification exams have been used as the primary methods of preventing unqualified individuals from entering medical practice. Despite the critical nature of the decision made at the time of licensure/certification, there is no information about the validity of these examinations for predicting subsequent practice and health outcome. In this article, the assumptions implicit in the current use of licensing/certifying examinations are identified, the relevant evidence is reviewed, and the implications of this evidence for current methods of measurement are discussed.

Key concepts: Credentialing, Licensure, Certification, Accreditation, Medical education, Medicine, Public health, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the Public being Protected? Prevention of Suboptimalmedical Practice Through Training Programs and Credentialing Examinations — Research Paper | ScholarLens