1976•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of wild oat (Avena fatua), kanki (Phalaris minor) and forage sorghum (Sorghum vulgare)

Besime DOĞAN DAŞ, S. K. Arora, J. Prakash

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The chemical composition and nutritive value of Avena fatun, Phalaris minor and Sorghum vulgare has been compared. Phalaris minor is the best in vitro DMD fol1owed by Avena fatua and forage sorghum...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chemical composition and nutritive value of Avena fatun, Phalaris minor and Sorghum vulgare has been compared. Phalaris minor is the best in vitro DMD fol1owed by Avena fatua and forage sorghum...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chemical composition and nutritive value of Avena fatun, Phalaris minor and Sorghum vulgare has been compared. Phalaris minor is the best in vitro DMD fol1owed by Avena fatua and forage sorghum...

Key concepts: Phalaris minor, Avena fatua, Sorghum, Avena, Agronomy, Forage, Biology, Chemical composition

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of wild oat (Avena fatua), kanki (Phalaris minor) and forage sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) — Research Paper | ScholarLens