2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Environmental Justice in World Politics

Özgüç Orhan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

All environmental problems in one way or another are involved in the question of justice. The concept of “environmental justice ” has been in circulation for some time underlining the justice dimension of environmental issues. Given the globalization of environmental problems since 1970s, the environmental justice discourse has been increasingly used to frame various international or global environmental issues like toxic waste trade, ozone depletion, biodiversity protection, and global warming.1 There is now quite a number of phrases that can help us to think environmental justice outside state borders: “global environmental justice, ” “transnational environmental justice, ” “international environmental justice, ” and “international environmental equity.”2 Environmental scholars using these terms often fail to draw meaningful distinctions among them. I argue that this multiplicity of phrases signifies more than an inadvertent inflation of terminology. The terminological diversity we encounter in IR literature actually corresponds to different modes of environmental justice in world politics. Environmental issues in world politics are often studied along three spatial dimensions: international, transnational, and global. Despite the fact that these three dimensions are intertwined in the real world, we can draw analytical distinctions among them. The international

About this research paper

What this paper is about

All environmental problems in one way or another are involved in the question of justice. The concept of “environmental justice ” has been in circulation for some time underlining the justice dimension of environmental issues. Given the globalization of environmental problems since 1970s, the environmental justice discourse has been increasingly used to frame various international or global environmental issues like toxic waste trade, ozone depletion, biodiversity protection, and global warming.1 There is now quite a number of phrases that can help us to think environmental justice outside state borders: “global environmental justice, ” “transnational environmental justice, ” “international environmental justice, ” and “international environmental equity.”2 Environmental scholars using these terms often fail to draw meaningful distinctions among them. I argue that this multiplicity of phrases signifies more than an inadvertent inflation of terminology. The terminological diversity we encounter in IR literature actually corresponds to different modes of environmental justice in world politics. Environmental issues in world politics are often studied along three spatial dimensions: international, transnational, and global. Despite the fact that these three dimensions are intertwined in the real world, we can draw analytical distinctions among them. The international

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

All environmental problems in one way or another are involved in the question of justice. The concept of “environmental justice ” has been in circulation for some time underlining the justice dimension of environmental issues. Given the globalization of environmental problems since 1970s, the environmental justice discourse has been increasingly used to frame various international or global environmental issues like toxic waste trade, ozone depletion, biodiversity protection, and global warming.1 There is now quite a number of phrases that can help us to think environmental justice outside state borders: “global environmental justice, ” “transnational environmental justice, ” “international environmental justice, ” and “international environmental equity.”2 Environmental scholars using these terms often fail to draw meaningful distinctions among them. I argue that this multiplicity of phrases signifies more than an inadvertent inflation of terminology. The terminological diversity we encounter in IR literature actually corresponds to different modes of environmental justice in world politics. Environmental issues in world politics are often studied along three spatial dimensions: international, transnational, and global. Despite the fact that these three dimensions are intertwined in the real world, we can draw analytical distinctions among them. The international

Key concepts: Environmental justice, Politics, Economic Justice, Political science, Environmental studies, Environmental politics, Environmental ethics, Globalization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Environmental Justice in World Politics — Research Paper | ScholarLens