1999•Journal of the Brazilian Chemical SocietyOpen access

Flexible electrochromic windows: a comparison using liquid and solid electrolytes

Emerson Marcelo Girotto, Marco‐A. De Paoli

Open full text 35 citations

Abstract

In the present work, two electrochromic devices (or electrochromic windows) based on intrinsically conducting polymers were assembled and characterized. For both devices, the materials used on the assembling were the same except for the electrolyte layer. In the first, we used as electrolyte a propylene carbonate solution and in the second the elastomer poly(epichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide), both containing LiClO4. The conductivity of the liquid electrolyte (10-3 S cm-1) is approximately two orders of magnitude higher than for the solid electrolyte and we obtained very good electrochromic properties in both cases. The calculated electrochromic efficiency at 640 nm was 700 C cm-2 for the liquid electrolyte device and 360 C cm-2 for the solid state device. Solid state electrochromic windows have been investigated and some of its advantages over windows with liquid electrolytes are discussed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the present work, two electrochromic devices (or electrochromic windows) based on intrinsically conducting polymers were assembled and characterized. For both devices, the materials used on the assembling were the same except for the electrolyte layer. In the first, we used as electrolyte a propylene carbonate solution and in the second the elastomer poly(epichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide), both containing LiClO4. The conductivity of the liquid electrolyte (10-3 S cm-1) is approximately two orders of magnitude higher than for the solid electrolyte and we obtained very good electrochromic properties in both cases. The calculated electrochromic efficiency at 640 nm was 700 C cm-2 for the liquid electrolyte device and 360 C cm-2 for the solid state device. Solid state electrochromic windows have been investigated and some of its advantages over windows with liquid electrolytes are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the present work, two electrochromic devices (or electrochromic windows) based on intrinsically conducting polymers were assembled and characterized. For both devices, the materials used on the assembling were the same except for the electrolyte layer. In the first, we used as electrolyte a propylene carbonate solution and in the second the elastomer poly(epichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide), both containing LiClO4. The conductivity of the liquid electrolyte (10-3 S cm-1) is approximately two orders of magnitude higher than for the solid electrolyte and we obtained very good electrochromic properties in both cases. The calculated electrochromic efficiency at 640 nm was 700 C cm-2 for the liquid electrolyte device and 360 C cm-2 for the solid state device. Solid state electrochromic windows have been investigated and some of its advantages over windows with liquid electrolytes are discussed.

Key concepts: Electrochromism, Electrolyte, Propylene carbonate, Electrochromic devices, Materials science, Ethylene oxide, Propylene oxide, Polymer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flexible electrochromic windows: a comparison using liquid and solid electrolytes — Research Paper | ScholarLens