2001Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal ProductionRequires access

Evaluation of an oestrone sulphate dipstick immunoassay for pregnancy testing mares

J.I. Stewart, Kathy Henderson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Serum samples from 213 mares were received for routine pregnancy testing and analysed by a conventional oestrone sulphate (OS) enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) and a new OS dipstick immunoassay. OS concentrations, measured by EIA, in 122 of the samples were 20 ng/ml. Of these, 89 also returned a ‘pregnant’ diagnosis by the dipstick assay, but 2 returned a ‘not pregnant’ diagnosis. Both these mares were found to be pregnant on follow up, indicating that the dipstick test had returned a false negative diagnosis in each instance. These results show that there is 100% agreement between the conventional OS EIA and the new dipstick assay in diagnosing ‘non pregnancy’. However, the dipstick assay may return a small proportion (2.2%) of false negative diagnoses relative to the EIA. Overall, the new dipstick immunoassay offers a practical alternative to the OS EIA for diagnosing pregnancy status in mares.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Serum samples from 213 mares were received for routine pregnancy testing and analysed by a conventional oestrone sulphate (OS) enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) and a new OS dipstick immunoassay. OS concentrations, measured by EIA, in 122 of the samples were 20 ng/ml. Of these, 89 also returned a ‘pregnant’ diagnosis by the dipstick assay, but 2 returned a ‘not pregnant’ diagnosis. Both these mares were found to be pregnant on follow up, indicating that the dipstick test had returned a false negative diagnosis in each instance. These results show that there is 100% agreement between the conventional OS EIA and the new dipstick assay in diagnosing ‘non pregnancy’. However, the dipstick assay may return a small proportion (2.2%) of false negative diagnoses relative to the EIA. Overall, the new dipstick immunoassay offers a practical alternative to the OS EIA for diagnosing pregnancy status in mares.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Serum samples from 213 mares were received for routine pregnancy testing and analysed by a conventional oestrone sulphate (OS) enzymeimmunoassay (EIA) and a new OS dipstick immunoassay. OS concentrations, measured by EIA, in 122 of the samples were 20 ng/ml. Of these, 89 also returned a ‘pregnant’ diagnosis by the dipstick assay, but 2 returned a ‘not pregnant’ diagnosis. Both these mares were found to be pregnant on follow up, indicating that the dipstick test had returned a false negative diagnosis in each instance. These results show that there is 100% agreement between the conventional OS EIA and the new dipstick assay in diagnosing ‘non pregnancy’. However, the dipstick assay may return a small proportion (2.2%) of false negative diagnoses relative to the EIA. Overall, the new dipstick immunoassay offers a practical alternative to the OS EIA for diagnosing pregnancy status in mares.

Key concepts: Dipstick, Immunoassay, Medicine, Pregnancy, Pregnancy test, Obstetrics, Gynecology, Urine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of an oestrone sulphate dipstick immunoassay for pregnancy testing mares — Research Paper | ScholarLens