2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

A new reduction model of inconsistent decision table

Si-Yu Jiang, Yansheng Lu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Two reduction definitions have been introduced in classical rough set theory. One is an algebra definition, and the other is an information definition. However, the two definitions both regard accuracy of rules as criteria of reduction and the former only cares accuracy of deterministic rules, the latter cares accuracy of entire rules. Therefore, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two definitions respectively could be different. This paper presents a new reduction model that its criteria of reduction combine accuracy and coverage of rules. Correspondingly, this paper proposes two new reduction definitions under the new model. By analyzing and testing, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two new definitions respectively are uniform. In addition, the reduction results with respect to the new reduction model may arrive at a better effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two reduction definitions have been introduced in classical rough set theory. One is an algebra definition, and the other is an information definition. However, the two definitions both regard accuracy of rules as criteria of reduction and the former only cares accuracy of deterministic rules, the latter cares accuracy of entire rules. Therefore, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two definitions respectively could be different. This paper presents a new reduction model that its criteria of reduction combine accuracy and coverage of rules. Correspondingly, this paper proposes two new reduction definitions under the new model. By analyzing and testing, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two new definitions respectively are uniform. In addition, the reduction results with respect to the new reduction model may arrive at a better effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two reduction definitions have been introduced in classical rough set theory. One is an algebra definition, and the other is an information definition. However, the two definitions both regard accuracy of rules as criteria of reduction and the former only cares accuracy of deterministic rules, the latter cares accuracy of entire rules. Therefore, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two definitions respectively could be different. This paper presents a new reduction model that its criteria of reduction combine accuracy and coverage of rules. Correspondingly, this paper proposes two new reduction definitions under the new model. By analyzing and testing, for inconsistent decision table, the reduction results that we obtain by using the two new definitions respectively are uniform. In addition, the reduction results with respect to the new reduction model may arrive at a better effect.

Key concepts: Reduction (mathematics), Decision table, Rough set, Table (database), Computer science, Set (abstract data type), Data reduction, Data mining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A new reduction model of inconsistent decision table — Research Paper | ScholarLens