2013Journal of Investment ComplianceRequires access

FCPA broker-dealer case highlights compliance risks for financial institutions

Philip E. Urofsky, Danforth Newcomb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide suggestions to the banking and finance sectors on managing FCPA risks in light of a May 2013 FCPA enforcement action against employees of a US broker-dealer. Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides details of the May 2013 enforcement action, cites other FCPA enforcement actions in financial services, discusses various types of FCPA risks for financial services firms, lists elements the US and UK governments have considered in evaluating companies' anti-bribery compliance policies and controls, and recommends measures for financial services firms to limit FCPA risks. Findings – The early May FCPA enforcement action makes clear that the financial services industry is very much on the radar screen of the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice. Practical implications – A general response to limiting FCPA risk should include the development of an effective FCPA compliance program and adequate due diligence into potential third-party partners and target companies. Recent industry experience shows the potential protection in careful and comprehensive FCPA risk identification and risk management efforts. Originality/value – The paper provides practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide suggestions to the banking and finance sectors on managing FCPA risks in light of a May 2013 FCPA enforcement action against employees of a US broker-dealer. Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides details of the May 2013 enforcement action, cites other FCPA enforcement actions in financial services, discusses various types of FCPA risks for financial services firms, lists elements the US and UK governments have considered in evaluating companies' anti-bribery compliance policies and controls, and recommends measures for financial services firms to limit FCPA risks. Findings – The early May FCPA enforcement action makes clear that the financial services industry is very much on the radar screen of the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice. Practical implications – A general response to limiting FCPA risk should include the development of an effective FCPA compliance program and adequate due diligence into potential third-party partners and target companies. Recent industry experience shows the potential protection in careful and comprehensive FCPA risk identification and risk management efforts. Originality/value – The paper provides practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide suggestions to the banking and finance sectors on managing FCPA risks in light of a May 2013 FCPA enforcement action against employees of a US broker-dealer. Design/methodology/approach – The paper provides details of the May 2013 enforcement action, cites other FCPA enforcement actions in financial services, discusses various types of FCPA risks for financial services firms, lists elements the US and UK governments have considered in evaluating companies' anti-bribery compliance policies and controls, and recommends measures for financial services firms to limit FCPA risks. Findings – The early May FCPA enforcement action makes clear that the financial services industry is very much on the radar screen of the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice. Practical implications – A general response to limiting FCPA risk should include the development of an effective FCPA compliance program and adequate due diligence into potential third-party partners and target companies. Recent industry experience shows the potential protection in careful and comprehensive FCPA risk identification and risk management efforts. Originality/value – The paper provides practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.

Key concepts: Due diligence, Enforcement, Business, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Commission, Financial services, Broker-dealer, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FCPA broker-dealer case highlights compliance risks for financial institutions — Research Paper | ScholarLens