A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF END‐TO‐SIDE PORTACAVAL SHUNTING AND SIDE‐TO‐SIDE MESOCAVAL SHUNTING ON HEPATIC HAEMODYNAMICS IN THE DOG
S A Jenkins, Andrew Taylor, J. Johnson, S. K. Shimlrty, J N Baxter, R. A. Shields
Abstract
S A Jenkins, Andrew Taylor, J. Johnson, S. K. Shimlrty, J N Baxter, R. A. Shields
Abstract
Functional liver blood flow and hepatic artery flow were measured before and after either end-to-side portacaval or side-to-side mesocaval shunting in dogs. Functional liver blood fell by approximately 50% following both portacaval and mesocaval shunting. The hepatic artery response was variable after both portacaval and mesocaval shunts. It is concluded that side-to-side mesocaval shunts do not preserve hepatic blood flow or produce a greater compensatory increase in hepatic artery flow than conventional portacaval shunts.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Functional liver blood flow and hepatic artery flow were measured before and after either end-to-side portacaval or side-to-side mesocaval shunting in dogs. Functional liver blood fell by approximately 50% following both portacaval and mesocaval shunting. The hepatic artery response was variable after both portacaval and mesocaval shunts. It is concluded that side-to-side mesocaval shunts do not preserve hepatic blood flow or produce a greater compensatory increase in hepatic artery flow than conventional portacaval shunts.
Key concepts: Shunting, Portacaval shunt, Portacaval anastomosis, Medicine, Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Artery, Portal hypertension