The Timing of Metropolitan Decentralization: A Contribution to the Debate
Leo F. Schnore
Abstract
Leo F. Schnore
Abstract
Some writers contend that metropolitan decentralization is a new phenomenon; others insist that it is a pattern of long standing. Although fraught with problems of measurement, a historical-statistical investigation throws some new light on the question. The results offer some solace to both camps; although decentralization appeared a century ago, it did not become a widespread pattern until after World War II. What is needed now is a return to the theoretical insights of earlier writers and research geared to the study of the metropolitan community as the spatial expression of a complex social system.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Some writers contend that metropolitan decentralization is a new phenomenon; others insist that it is a pattern of long standing. Although fraught with problems of measurement, a historical-statistical investigation throws some new light on the question. The results offer some solace to both camps; although decentralization appeared a century ago, it did not become a widespread pattern until after World War II. What is needed now is a return to the theoretical insights of earlier writers and research geared to the study of the metropolitan community as the spatial expression of a complex social system.
Key concepts: Decentralization, Metropolitan area, Phenomenon, World War II, Expression (computer science), Political science, Sociology, Political economy