1959Journal of the American Institute of PlannersRequires access

The Timing of Metropolitan Decentralization: A Contribution to the Debate

Leo F. Schnore

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Some writers contend that metropolitan decentralization is a new phenomenon; others insist that it is a pattern of long standing. Although fraught with problems of measurement, a historical-statistical investigation throws some new light on the question. The results offer some solace to both camps; although decentralization appeared a century ago, it did not become a widespread pattern until after World War II. What is needed now is a return to the theoretical insights of earlier writers and research geared to the study of the metropolitan community as the spatial expression of a complex social system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some writers contend that metropolitan decentralization is a new phenomenon; others insist that it is a pattern of long standing. Although fraught with problems of measurement, a historical-statistical investigation throws some new light on the question. The results offer some solace to both camps; although decentralization appeared a century ago, it did not become a widespread pattern until after World War II. What is needed now is a return to the theoretical insights of earlier writers and research geared to the study of the metropolitan community as the spatial expression of a complex social system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some writers contend that metropolitan decentralization is a new phenomenon; others insist that it is a pattern of long standing. Although fraught with problems of measurement, a historical-statistical investigation throws some new light on the question. The results offer some solace to both camps; although decentralization appeared a century ago, it did not become a widespread pattern until after World War II. What is needed now is a return to the theoretical insights of earlier writers and research geared to the study of the metropolitan community as the spatial expression of a complex social system.

Key concepts: Decentralization, Metropolitan area, Phenomenon, World War II, Expression (computer science), Political science, Sociology, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Timing of Metropolitan Decentralization: A Contribution to the Debate — Research Paper | ScholarLens