1987EcologyRequires access

Ecological Scale and Habitat Use

Douglas W. Morris

Open publisher page 507 citations

Abstract

Population density can respond to habitat at different scales. If habitat selection occurs as a consequence of resource exploitation, the density of fine—grained consumers should reflect microhabitat variation. But if habitat use is controlled by a variety of selective pressures, it is no longer apparent whether density should respond to micro— or macrohabitat. These two alternatives can be tested simultaneously by multiple regression models where macrohabitats are represented by dummy variables. When the local densities of two Temperate Zone rodents were analyzed in this way, macrohabitat and temporal effects were consistent significant predictors of rodent density; microhabitat was not. This analysis suggests species whose patterns of resource and habitat use probably depart from classical interpretations of species coexistence. It is probably premature to assess the role of habitat selection in the structure of ecological systems until the results of further tests of habitat scaling are reported.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Population density can respond to habitat at different scales. If habitat selection occurs as a consequence of resource exploitation, the density of fine—grained consumers should reflect microhabitat variation. But if habitat use is controlled by a variety of selective pressures, it is no longer apparent whether density should respond to micro— or macrohabitat. These two alternatives can be tested simultaneously by multiple regression models where macrohabitats are represented by dummy variables. When the local densities of two Temperate Zone rodents were analyzed in this way, macrohabitat and temporal effects were consistent significant predictors of rodent density; microhabitat was not. This analysis suggests species whose patterns of resource and habitat use probably depart from classical interpretations of species coexistence. It is probably premature to assess the role of habitat selection in the structure of ecological systems until the results of further tests of habitat scaling are reported.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 507 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Population density can respond to habitat at different scales. If habitat selection occurs as a consequence of resource exploitation, the density of fine—grained consumers should reflect microhabitat variation. But if habitat use is controlled by a variety of selective pressures, it is no longer apparent whether density should respond to micro— or macrohabitat. These two alternatives can be tested simultaneously by multiple regression models where macrohabitats are represented by dummy variables. When the local densities of two Temperate Zone rodents were analyzed in this way, macrohabitat and temporal effects were consistent significant predictors of rodent density; microhabitat was not. This analysis suggests species whose patterns of resource and habitat use probably depart from classical interpretations of species coexistence. It is probably premature to assess the role of habitat selection in the structure of ecological systems until the results of further tests of habitat scaling are reported.

Key concepts: Habitat, Ecology, Temperate climate, Population density, Selection (genetic algorithm), Population, Biology, Abundance (ecology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ecological Scale and Habitat Use — Research Paper | ScholarLens