1982Drug Development ResearchRequires access

The in vivo pharmacological profile of histamine (H1) antagonists in the rat

C. J. E. Niemegeers, F. Awouters, Paul A. J. Janssen

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

Abstract Thirteen known H1‐antagonists were studied in a series of pharmacological in vivo tests in rats. Antihistamine activity, oral absorption, and duration of action were determined in the compound 48/80 test. The dissociation between the activity in the compound 48/80 test and in the other tests was used as a measured of antihistaminic specificity. Properties common to several H1‐antagonists were: antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine, promethazine, mequitazine, azatadine, cyproheptadine, chlorphenriamine, clemastine, pyrilamine) and anti‐serotonin activity (mianserin, pizotifen, cyproheptadine, prometazine, diphenhydramine, pyrilamine). Sedative effects of H1‐antagonists were not detected by the pharmacological tests used here. Astemizole, ketotifen, and terfenadine were found to be very specific H1‐antagonists. For ketotifen and terfenadine, oral activity (1/5 and 1/25 of astemizole, respectively) and oral absorption (1/50 and 1/7 respectively) were poor, and the duration of action (4 and 6 hr, respectively) was relatively short. Astemizole was as potent orally as it was subcutaneously (ED50 = 0.11 mg/kg) and appeared to have a duration of action as long as 24 hr.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Thirteen known H1‐antagonists were studied in a series of pharmacological in vivo tests in rats. Antihistamine activity, oral absorption, and duration of action were determined in the compound 48/80 test. The dissociation between the activity in the compound 48/80 test and in the other tests was used as a measured of antihistaminic specificity. Properties common to several H1‐antagonists were: antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine, promethazine, mequitazine, azatadine, cyproheptadine, chlorphenriamine, clemastine, pyrilamine) and anti‐serotonin activity (mianserin, pizotifen, cyproheptadine, prometazine, diphenhydramine, pyrilamine). Sedative effects of H1‐antagonists were not detected by the pharmacological tests used here. Astemizole, ketotifen, and terfenadine were found to be very specific H1‐antagonists. For ketotifen and terfenadine, oral activity (1/5 and 1/25 of astemizole, respectively) and oral absorption (1/50 and 1/7 respectively) were poor, and the duration of action (4 and 6 hr, respectively) was relatively short. Astemizole was as potent orally as it was subcutaneously (ED50 = 0.11 mg/kg) and appeared to have a duration of action as long as 24 hr.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Thirteen known H1‐antagonists were studied in a series of pharmacological in vivo tests in rats. Antihistamine activity, oral absorption, and duration of action were determined in the compound 48/80 test. The dissociation between the activity in the compound 48/80 test and in the other tests was used as a measured of antihistaminic specificity. Properties common to several H1‐antagonists were: antimuscarinic (diphenhydramine, promethazine, mequitazine, azatadine, cyproheptadine, chlorphenriamine, clemastine, pyrilamine) and anti‐serotonin activity (mianserin, pizotifen, cyproheptadine, prometazine, diphenhydramine, pyrilamine). Sedative effects of H1‐antagonists were not detected by the pharmacological tests used here. Astemizole, ketotifen, and terfenadine were found to be very specific H1‐antagonists. For ketotifen and terfenadine, oral activity (1/5 and 1/25 of astemizole, respectively) and oral absorption (1/50 and 1/7 respectively) were poor, and the duration of action (4 and 6 hr, respectively) was relatively short. Astemizole was as potent orally as it was subcutaneously (ED50 = 0.11 mg/kg) and appeared to have a duration of action as long as 24 hr.

Key concepts: Astemizole, Cyproheptadine, Ketotifen, Terfenadine, Pharmacology, Pyrilamine, Diphenhydramine, Antihistamine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The in vivo pharmacological profile of histamine (H1) antagonists in the rat — Research Paper | ScholarLens