The rhetorical opposition to controversial wars: Rhetorical timing as a generic consideration
Jeff D. Bass
Abstract
Jeff D. Bass
Abstract
In this essay, the claim is advanced that loosely structured, complex rhetorical situations often possess a strong internal structure with regard to their development or maturation over the course of time. It is argued that this position has important implications for the generic criticism of rhetorical discourse. These implications are developed via an analysis of the discourse delivered in response to two complex rhetorical situations in American history: the American Revolution and the Vietnam War.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this essay, the claim is advanced that loosely structured, complex rhetorical situations often possess a strong internal structure with regard to their development or maturation over the course of time. It is argued that this position has important implications for the generic criticism of rhetorical discourse. These implications are developed via an analysis of the discourse delivered in response to two complex rhetorical situations in American history: the American Revolution and the Vietnam War.
Key concepts: Rhetorical question, Rhetorical criticism, Opposition (politics), Rhetoric, Sociology, Political science, Linguistics, Law