1966Soil Science Society of America JournalRequires access

Crop Response From Tile and Surface Drainage

G. O. Schwab, George S. Taylor, James L. Fouss, E. Stibbe

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Abstract The effects of various drainage systems and different levels of N treatments on corn ( Zea mays ) yields were evaluated for a fine‐textured lakebed soil during a period of 3 years. The drainage treatments consisted of undrained plots, surface drained, the drained, and a surface and tile drained combination. Excess wetness was provided each year by sprinkling all plots in June and July. The three drained treatments gave significantly higher yields than the undrained treatment, and N increased corn yields significantly at all drainage levels. An economic evaluation of the drainage systems with a N application of 100 lb/acre showed that the benefit/cost ratio for surface drains was 10:1; tile drains 6:1; and the combination tile‐surface drainage system 4:1, when compared to the un drained treatment. The study indicated that the surface drainage system gave the greatest benefit per dollar invested in the drainage system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The effects of various drainage systems and different levels of N treatments on corn ( Zea mays ) yields were evaluated for a fine‐textured lakebed soil during a period of 3 years. The drainage treatments consisted of undrained plots, surface drained, the drained, and a surface and tile drained combination. Excess wetness was provided each year by sprinkling all plots in June and July. The three drained treatments gave significantly higher yields than the undrained treatment, and N increased corn yields significantly at all drainage levels. An economic evaluation of the drainage systems with a N application of 100 lb/acre showed that the benefit/cost ratio for surface drains was 10:1; tile drains 6:1; and the combination tile‐surface drainage system 4:1, when compared to the un drained treatment. The study indicated that the surface drainage system gave the greatest benefit per dollar invested in the drainage system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The effects of various drainage systems and different levels of N treatments on corn ( Zea mays ) yields were evaluated for a fine‐textured lakebed soil during a period of 3 years. The drainage treatments consisted of undrained plots, surface drained, the drained, and a surface and tile drained combination. Excess wetness was provided each year by sprinkling all plots in June and July. The three drained treatments gave significantly higher yields than the undrained treatment, and N increased corn yields significantly at all drainage levels. An economic evaluation of the drainage systems with a N application of 100 lb/acre showed that the benefit/cost ratio for surface drains was 10:1; tile drains 6:1; and the combination tile‐surface drainage system 4:1, when compared to the un drained treatment. The study indicated that the surface drainage system gave the greatest benefit per dollar invested in the drainage system.

Key concepts: Tile drainage, Drainage, Tile, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Drainage system (geomorphology), Acre, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crop Response From Tile and Surface Drainage — Research Paper | ScholarLens