1968The Transactions of the Zoological Society of LondonRequires access

Taxonomy of Meloidogyne (Nematodea: Heteroderidae) with descriptions of four new species*

A. G. Whitehead

Open publisher page 141 citations

Abstract

A review of the literature on Meloidogyne Goeldi, 1887 (endoparasitic gall‐forming nematodes in roots of higher plants) emphasised the need for a detailed morphological study of the genus to provide an adequate basis for the identification of its species. The taxonomic study reported here confirmed the morphological distinctness of 23 species, including four new ones–M. decalineata sp. n., M. ethiopica sp. n. and M. megadora sp. n. from Africa and M. indica sp. n. from India. M. inornata Lordello, 1956a and M. tadshikistanica Kiryanova & Ivanova, 1965 may also be distinct species but M. poghossianae Kiryanova, 1963 is regarded as a species inquirenda. Meloidogyne spp. can be identified by the posterior cuticular pattern of the females and the morphology of the water‐hatched, fixed larvae and of the males. Measurements, especially of water‐hatched, fixed larvae are also useful in the differentiation of species. An improved technique for identification of Meloidogyne spp. is proposed and keys based on adults and on larvae are presented. Types are designated for M. exigua Goeldi, 1887, M. arenaria (Neal, 1889) Chitwood, 1949, M. hapla Chitwood, 1949, M. incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949, M. javanica (Treub, 1885) Chitwood, 1949 and M. thamesi Chitwood in Chitwood, Specht & Havis, 1952 (Goodey, T., 1963). The genus Hypsoperine Sledge & Golden, 1964 is rejected and two of its species renamed M. graminis (Sledge & Golden, 1964) comb. n. and M. spartinae (Rau & Fassuliotis, 1965) comb, n., while H. acronea (Coetzee, 1956) Sledge & Golden, 1964 is returned to M. acronea Coetzee, 1956.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A review of the literature on Meloidogyne Goeldi, 1887 (endoparasitic gall‐forming nematodes in roots of higher plants) emphasised the need for a detailed morphological study of the genus to provide an adequate basis for the identification of its species. The taxonomic study reported here confirmed the morphological distinctness of 23 species, including four new ones–M. decalineata sp. n., M. ethiopica sp. n. and M. megadora sp. n. from Africa and M. indica sp. n. from India. M. inornata Lordello, 1956a and M. tadshikistanica Kiryanova & Ivanova, 1965 may also be distinct species but M. poghossianae Kiryanova, 1963 is regarded as a species inquirenda. Meloidogyne spp. can be identified by the posterior cuticular pattern of the females and the morphology of the water‐hatched, fixed larvae and of the males. Measurements, especially of water‐hatched, fixed larvae are also useful in the differentiation of species. An improved technique for identification of Meloidogyne spp. is proposed and keys based on adults and on larvae are presented. Types are designated for M. exigua Goeldi, 1887, M. arenaria (Neal, 1889) Chitwood, 1949, M. hapla Chitwood, 1949, M. incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949, M. javanica (Treub, 1885) Chitwood, 1949 and M. thamesi Chitwood in Chitwood, Specht & Havis, 1952 (Goodey, T., 1963). The genus Hypsoperine Sledge & Golden, 1964 is rejected and two of its species renamed M. graminis (Sledge & Golden, 1964) comb. n. and M. spartinae (Rau & Fassuliotis, 1965) comb, n., while H. acronea (Coetzee, 1956) Sledge & Golden, 1964 is returned to M. acronea Coetzee, 1956.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 141 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A review of the literature on Meloidogyne Goeldi, 1887 (endoparasitic gall‐forming nematodes in roots of higher plants) emphasised the need for a detailed morphological study of the genus to provide an adequate basis for the identification of its species. The taxonomic study reported here confirmed the morphological distinctness of 23 species, including four new ones–M. decalineata sp. n., M. ethiopica sp. n. and M. megadora sp. n. from Africa and M. indica sp. n. from India. M. inornata Lordello, 1956a and M. tadshikistanica Kiryanova & Ivanova, 1965 may also be distinct species but M. poghossianae Kiryanova, 1963 is regarded as a species inquirenda. Meloidogyne spp. can be identified by the posterior cuticular pattern of the females and the morphology of the water‐hatched, fixed larvae and of the males. Measurements, especially of water‐hatched, fixed larvae are also useful in the differentiation of species. An improved technique for identification of Meloidogyne spp. is proposed and keys based on adults and on larvae are presented. Types are designated for M. exigua Goeldi, 1887, M. arenaria (Neal, 1889) Chitwood, 1949, M. hapla Chitwood, 1949, M. incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitwood, 1949, M. javanica (Treub, 1885) Chitwood, 1949 and M. thamesi Chitwood in Chitwood, Specht & Havis, 1952 (Goodey, T., 1963). The genus Hypsoperine Sledge & Golden, 1964 is rejected and two of its species renamed M. graminis (Sledge & Golden, 1964) comb. n. and M. spartinae (Rau & Fassuliotis, 1965) comb, n., while H. acronea (Coetzee, 1956) Sledge & Golden, 1964 is returned to M. acronea Coetzee, 1956.

Key concepts: Biology, Larva, Taxonomy (biology), Botany, Terra incognita, Nematology, Zoology, Genus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Taxonomy of Meloidogyne (Nematodea: Heteroderidae) with descriptions of four new species* — Research Paper | ScholarLens