1993•Loisir et Société / Society and LeisureRequires access

Democratization Revisited: Seven Theses on the Democratization of Sport and Active Leisure

Peter Donnelly

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

In recent years, sociologists and historians of sport appear to have paid little attention to the process of democratization. “Classes to masses” type statements are still heard, and the assumption persists that if the participants in a sport at some earlier time came from a higher social class than the current participants, then democratization has magically occurred. This paper represents an attempt to revive the concept of democratization by providing a more comprehensive definition, which includes the notion that democratization concerns far more than providing the opportunity to participate; by considering the actual processes by which democratization occurs, and the continuing barriers to democratization; and by considering the circumstances under which democratization should occur, and the advantages of increased democratization in sport and leisure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years, sociologists and historians of sport appear to have paid little attention to the process of democratization. “Classes to masses” type statements are still heard, and the assumption persists that if the participants in a sport at some earlier time came from a higher social class than the current participants, then democratization has magically occurred. This paper represents an attempt to revive the concept of democratization by providing a more comprehensive definition, which includes the notion that democratization concerns far more than providing the opportunity to participate; by considering the actual processes by which democratization occurs, and the continuing barriers to democratization; and by considering the circumstances under which democratization should occur, and the advantages of increased democratization in sport and leisure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years, sociologists and historians of sport appear to have paid little attention to the process of democratization. “Classes to masses” type statements are still heard, and the assumption persists that if the participants in a sport at some earlier time came from a higher social class than the current participants, then democratization has magically occurred. This paper represents an attempt to revive the concept of democratization by providing a more comprehensive definition, which includes the notion that democratization concerns far more than providing the opportunity to participate; by considering the actual processes by which democratization occurs, and the continuing barriers to democratization; and by considering the circumstances under which democratization should occur, and the advantages of increased democratization in sport and leisure.

Key concepts: Democratization, Political science, Development economics, Sociology, Democracy, Politics, Economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Democratization Revisited: Seven Theses on the Democratization of Sport and Active Leisure — Research Paper | ScholarLens