1985The LaryngoscopeRequires access

Revision stapes surgery: Problems with some solutions

Eugene L. Derlacki

Open publisher page 76 citations

Abstract

A review of 217 consecutive revision stapes operations performed during a ten-year period revealed that the surgeon encounters more pathological variables than he does during primary operations. Hence, the technical solutions are less stereotyped and the net results less predictable. Prosthesis displacement, with or without incus tip erosion, was the most common primary cause of failure (82%). However, oval window problems such as footplate refixation, perilymph fistula, otosclerotic regrowth, and lateralized oval window membrane in 60% of cases often complicated prosthesis displacement. First revision operations in 174 cases resulted in postoperative bone-air deficit of 10 dB or less in 65% of cases, much better than the 45% for second revision results, and the 25% for third revisions. These statistics provide our practice with a realistic prognosis when discussing revision stapes surgery with the individual surgical candidate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A review of 217 consecutive revision stapes operations performed during a ten-year period revealed that the surgeon encounters more pathological variables than he does during primary operations. Hence, the technical solutions are less stereotyped and the net results less predictable. Prosthesis displacement, with or without incus tip erosion, was the most common primary cause of failure (82%). However, oval window problems such as footplate refixation, perilymph fistula, otosclerotic regrowth, and lateralized oval window membrane in 60% of cases often complicated prosthesis displacement. First revision operations in 174 cases resulted in postoperative bone-air deficit of 10 dB or less in 65% of cases, much better than the 45% for second revision results, and the 25% for third revisions. These statistics provide our practice with a realistic prognosis when discussing revision stapes surgery with the individual surgical candidate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 76 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A review of 217 consecutive revision stapes operations performed during a ten-year period revealed that the surgeon encounters more pathological variables than he does during primary operations. Hence, the technical solutions are less stereotyped and the net results less predictable. Prosthesis displacement, with or without incus tip erosion, was the most common primary cause of failure (82%). However, oval window problems such as footplate refixation, perilymph fistula, otosclerotic regrowth, and lateralized oval window membrane in 60% of cases often complicated prosthesis displacement. First revision operations in 174 cases resulted in postoperative bone-air deficit of 10 dB or less in 65% of cases, much better than the 45% for second revision results, and the 25% for third revisions. These statistics provide our practice with a realistic prognosis when discussing revision stapes surgery with the individual surgical candidate.

Key concepts: Stapes, Incus, Oval window, Footplate, Medicine, Prosthesis, Stapes surgery, Stapedectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revision stapes surgery: Problems with some solutions — Research Paper | ScholarLens