1985IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringRequires access

The Contribution of Vessel Volume Change and Blood Resistivity Change to the Electrical Impedance Pulse

T. M. Ravi Shankar, John G. Webster, Shu-Yong Shao

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

An impedance pulse, recorded noninvasively, has contributions due to both the change in blood volume of the arteries and to the change in the blood resistivity. Other researchers have tried to quantify the relative contributions and have either underestimated or overestimated the contributions since they did not simulate the physiological conditions. We have used an in vitro flow circulation system to more closely simulate the physiological conditions and quantify the two contributions. We find that the blood resistivity change contribution is strong enough (21.5 percent of the arterial volume change contribution) to change the morphology of the impedance pulse. There is, however, a phase difference between the two contributions. As a result of this, the blood resistivity change contribution to the height of the impedance pulse will be less than 5.5 percent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An impedance pulse, recorded noninvasively, has contributions due to both the change in blood volume of the arteries and to the change in the blood resistivity. Other researchers have tried to quantify the relative contributions and have either underestimated or overestimated the contributions since they did not simulate the physiological conditions. We have used an in vitro flow circulation system to more closely simulate the physiological conditions and quantify the two contributions. We find that the blood resistivity change contribution is strong enough (21.5 percent of the arterial volume change contribution) to change the morphology of the impedance pulse. There is, however, a phase difference between the two contributions. As a result of this, the blood resistivity change contribution to the height of the impedance pulse will be less than 5.5 percent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An impedance pulse, recorded noninvasively, has contributions due to both the change in blood volume of the arteries and to the change in the blood resistivity. Other researchers have tried to quantify the relative contributions and have either underestimated or overestimated the contributions since they did not simulate the physiological conditions. We have used an in vitro flow circulation system to more closely simulate the physiological conditions and quantify the two contributions. We find that the blood resistivity change contribution is strong enough (21.5 percent of the arterial volume change contribution) to change the morphology of the impedance pulse. There is, however, a phase difference between the two contributions. As a result of this, the blood resistivity change contribution to the height of the impedance pulse will be less than 5.5 percent.

Key concepts: Electrical resistivity and conductivity, Electrical impedance, Biomedical engineering, Pulse (music), Blood flow, Materials science, Volume (thermodynamics), Blood volume

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Contribution of Vessel Volume Change and Blood Resistivity Change to the Electrical Impedance Pulse — Research Paper | ScholarLens