1993Ultrastructural PathologyRequires access

Ultrastructural Immunolabeling in the Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Characterization of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Guillermo A. Herrera, Elba A. Turbat‐Herrera, Virginia G. Lockard

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a heterogenous entity with variable morphologic light microscopic expressions. In many cases a definite diagnosis is easily made by light microscopic examination, but in some cases this does not suffice. In the latter instances, immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural examination, or both are required to diagnose a neuroendocrine neoplasm. However, basing a diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia exclusively on the results obtained from immunocytochemical or ultrastructural evaluation of these tumors may not be entirely accurate in some instances. Ultrastructural immunolabeling plays a key role in accurately defining localization of immunoreactive substances in well-characterized neuroendocrine neoplasms, can assess colocalization of antigenic epitopes, helps define specificity and significance of immunocytochemistry results obtained at the light microscopic level, and is more sensitive than light microscopic immunocyto-chemistry. Some evolving diagnostic entities can be further characterized by utilization of ultrastructural labeling techniques. Controversies concerning the neuroendocrine nature of electron-dense structures identifiable at the ultrastructural level can be readily and accurately resolved. By providing a way to evaluate combined immunomorphologic parameters, ultrastructural immunogold labeling can settle important questions pertaining to neuroendocrine neoplasia. The present article illustrates a series of cases where the above-mentioned applications were tested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a heterogenous entity with variable morphologic light microscopic expressions. In many cases a definite diagnosis is easily made by light microscopic examination, but in some cases this does not suffice. In the latter instances, immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural examination, or both are required to diagnose a neuroendocrine neoplasm. However, basing a diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia exclusively on the results obtained from immunocytochemical or ultrastructural evaluation of these tumors may not be entirely accurate in some instances. Ultrastructural immunolabeling plays a key role in accurately defining localization of immunoreactive substances in well-characterized neuroendocrine neoplasms, can assess colocalization of antigenic epitopes, helps define specificity and significance of immunocytochemistry results obtained at the light microscopic level, and is more sensitive than light microscopic immunocyto-chemistry. Some evolving diagnostic entities can be further characterized by utilization of ultrastructural labeling techniques. Controversies concerning the neuroendocrine nature of electron-dense structures identifiable at the ultrastructural level can be readily and accurately resolved. By providing a way to evaluate combined immunomorphologic parameters, ultrastructural immunogold labeling can settle important questions pertaining to neuroendocrine neoplasia. The present article illustrates a series of cases where the above-mentioned applications were tested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a heterogenous entity with variable morphologic light microscopic expressions. In many cases a definite diagnosis is easily made by light microscopic examination, but in some cases this does not suffice. In the latter instances, immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural examination, or both are required to diagnose a neuroendocrine neoplasm. However, basing a diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia exclusively on the results obtained from immunocytochemical or ultrastructural evaluation of these tumors may not be entirely accurate in some instances. Ultrastructural immunolabeling plays a key role in accurately defining localization of immunoreactive substances in well-characterized neuroendocrine neoplasms, can assess colocalization of antigenic epitopes, helps define specificity and significance of immunocytochemistry results obtained at the light microscopic level, and is more sensitive than light microscopic immunocyto-chemistry. Some evolving diagnostic entities can be further characterized by utilization of ultrastructural labeling techniques. Controversies concerning the neuroendocrine nature of electron-dense structures identifiable at the ultrastructural level can be readily and accurately resolved. By providing a way to evaluate combined immunomorphologic parameters, ultrastructural immunogold labeling can settle important questions pertaining to neuroendocrine neoplasia. The present article illustrates a series of cases where the above-mentioned applications were tested.

Key concepts: Immunolabeling, Ultrastructure, Immunocytochemistry, Immunogold labelling, Pathology, Colocalization, Biology, Immunohistochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ultrastructural Immunolabeling in the Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Characterization of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms — Research Paper | ScholarLens