1997Canadian Journal of MicrobiologyRequires access

Rapid identification of Medicago nodulating strains by using two oligonucleotide probes complementary to 16S rDNA sequences

Sophie Rome, Jean-Claude Cleyet-Marel, L. A. Materon, Philippe Normand, Brigitte Brunel

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Symbiotic bacteria associated with the Medicago genus are separated into two closely related species named Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae. To discriminate rapidly between these two bacterial species, two 15-base DNA probes, 16Smfs and 16Smed, were designed from the alignment of 16S rDNA sequences to differentiate S. meliloti from S. medicae. Their specificities were evaluated by dot-blot hybridization experiments on 25 reference strains representing 13 species of Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium, and by comparison with all 16S rDNA sequences available in the GenBank data base. No cross-reaction was found with 16Smed, which was thus considered species specific for S. medicae. By contrast, as expected according to the 16S rDNA sequence alignment, the labeled 16Smfs probe cross-hybridized with the DNAs of S. meliloti, Sinorhizobium fredii, and Sinorhizobium saheli but not with the DNA of S. medicae. Since S. saheli and S. fredii do not nodulate Medicago, 16Smed and 16Smfs can be routinely used to characterize the two Sinorhizobium species nodulating Medicago from pure cultures or from Medicago root nodules. Fifty strains isolated from eight annual Medicago species were then characterized by using colony hybridizations. Sinorhizobium meliloti was more frequently obtained (> 80% isolates) than was S. medicae. Both Sinorhizobium species seemed to be trapped by annual Medicago and no plant-host specificity was detected.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Symbiotic bacteria associated with the Medicago genus are separated into two closely related species named Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae. To discriminate rapidly between these two bacterial species, two 15-base DNA probes, 16Smfs and 16Smed, were designed from the alignment of 16S rDNA sequences to differentiate S. meliloti from S. medicae. Their specificities were evaluated by dot-blot hybridization experiments on 25 reference strains representing 13 species of Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium, and by comparison with all 16S rDNA sequences available in the GenBank data base. No cross-reaction was found with 16Smed, which was thus considered species specific for S. medicae. By contrast, as expected according to the 16S rDNA sequence alignment, the labeled 16Smfs probe cross-hybridized with the DNAs of S. meliloti, Sinorhizobium fredii, and Sinorhizobium saheli but not with the DNA of S. medicae. Since S. saheli and S. fredii do not nodulate Medicago, 16Smed and 16Smfs can be routinely used to characterize the two Sinorhizobium species nodulating Medicago from pure cultures or from Medicago root nodules. Fifty strains isolated from eight annual Medicago species were then characterized by using colony hybridizations. Sinorhizobium meliloti was more frequently obtained (> 80% isolates) than was S. medicae. Both Sinorhizobium species seemed to be trapped by annual Medicago and no plant-host specificity was detected.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Symbiotic bacteria associated with the Medicago genus are separated into two closely related species named Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sinorhizobium medicae. To discriminate rapidly between these two bacterial species, two 15-base DNA probes, 16Smfs and 16Smed, were designed from the alignment of 16S rDNA sequences to differentiate S. meliloti from S. medicae. Their specificities were evaluated by dot-blot hybridization experiments on 25 reference strains representing 13 species of Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium, and by comparison with all 16S rDNA sequences available in the GenBank data base. No cross-reaction was found with 16Smed, which was thus considered species specific for S. medicae. By contrast, as expected according to the 16S rDNA sequence alignment, the labeled 16Smfs probe cross-hybridized with the DNAs of S. meliloti, Sinorhizobium fredii, and Sinorhizobium saheli but not with the DNA of S. medicae. Since S. saheli and S. fredii do not nodulate Medicago, 16Smed and 16Smfs can be routinely used to characterize the two Sinorhizobium species nodulating Medicago from pure cultures or from Medicago root nodules. Fifty strains isolated from eight annual Medicago species were then characterized by using colony hybridizations. Sinorhizobium meliloti was more frequently obtained (> 80% isolates) than was S. medicae. Both Sinorhizobium species seemed to be trapped by annual Medicago and no plant-host specificity was detected.

Key concepts: Sinorhizobium, Sinorhizobium meliloti, Biology, Medicago, 16S ribosomal RNA, Root nodule, Rhizobiaceae, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rapid identification of Medicago nodulating strains by using two oligonucleotide probes complementary to 16S rDNA sequences — Research Paper | ScholarLens