Botanising in a Sinocentric world: Robert Fortune's travels in China
Jeffrey Mather
Abstract
Jeffrey Mather
Abstract
This article will discuss the writings of Robert Fortune (1812–80), a Scottish plant collector who travelled in China during the 1840s and 1850s. After the First Opium War (1839–42), trade with China flourished and as European travellers, merchants, and missionaries moved inland, long-held views about China were both confirmed and contested. Fortune's travel books provide important insights into changing British attitudes towards China during this formative period, and often express highly conflicted and ambivalent views towards imperialism. This article will suggest that Fortune's writing can best be interpreted within the dynamic context of ‘informal imperalism’ and ultimately within a larger macroeconomic model of a Sinocentric economy. As one of the best known Victorians to travel to the Far East, his writing sheds light on the ways in which mid-nineteenth-century Britons imagined the very limits of empire.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article will discuss the writings of Robert Fortune (1812–80), a Scottish plant collector who travelled in China during the 1840s and 1850s. After the First Opium War (1839–42), trade with China flourished and as European travellers, merchants, and missionaries moved inland, long-held views about China were both confirmed and contested. Fortune's travel books provide important insights into changing British attitudes towards China during this formative period, and often express highly conflicted and ambivalent views towards imperialism. This article will suggest that Fortune's writing can best be interpreted within the dynamic context of ‘informal imperalism’ and ultimately within a larger macroeconomic model of a Sinocentric economy. As one of the best known Victorians to travel to the Far East, his writing sheds light on the ways in which mid-nineteenth-century Britons imagined the very limits of empire.
Key concepts: China, Opium, Ambivalence, Travel writing, Empire, Context (archaeology), History, Period (music)