2011Procedia EngineeringOpen access

Performance-Evaluation of Concrete Properties for Different Combined Aggregate Gradation Approaches

Warda Ashraf, Munaz Ahmed Noor

Open full text 64 citations

Abstract

Aggregate takes up 60%∼90% of total volume of concrete. Thus, concrete properties are highly affected by physical properties of its aggregate such as aggregate size distribution. With a view to achieve optimized gradation, there are various aggregate gradation tools or methods, such as, gradation curve, individual percent retained (IPR) curve, “8-18” band and combined fineness modulus (fineness modulus of total aggregate) etc. In this research, a comparative analysis of various tools and methods of aggregate gradation was performed through a number of trial mixes. Also a comparison of combined gradation and fractional (mixing fine and coarse aggregate) gradation is given. The workability, density and strength results from these concrete mixes are finally compared to propose a suitable aggregate gradation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aggregate takes up 60%∼90% of total volume of concrete. Thus, concrete properties are highly affected by physical properties of its aggregate such as aggregate size distribution. With a view to achieve optimized gradation, there are various aggregate gradation tools or methods, such as, gradation curve, individual percent retained (IPR) curve, “8-18” band and combined fineness modulus (fineness modulus of total aggregate) etc. In this research, a comparative analysis of various tools and methods of aggregate gradation was performed through a number of trial mixes. Also a comparison of combined gradation and fractional (mixing fine and coarse aggregate) gradation is given. The workability, density and strength results from these concrete mixes are finally compared to propose a suitable aggregate gradation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aggregate takes up 60%∼90% of total volume of concrete. Thus, concrete properties are highly affected by physical properties of its aggregate such as aggregate size distribution. With a view to achieve optimized gradation, there are various aggregate gradation tools or methods, such as, gradation curve, individual percent retained (IPR) curve, “8-18” band and combined fineness modulus (fineness modulus of total aggregate) etc. In this research, a comparative analysis of various tools and methods of aggregate gradation was performed through a number of trial mixes. Also a comparison of combined gradation and fractional (mixing fine and coarse aggregate) gradation is given. The workability, density and strength results from these concrete mixes are finally compared to propose a suitable aggregate gradation.

Key concepts: Gradation, Aggregate (composite), Fineness, Mixing (physics), Volume (thermodynamics), Materials science, Geotechnical engineering, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance-Evaluation of Concrete Properties for Different Combined Aggregate Gradation Approaches — Research Paper | ScholarLens