Paul Krugman’s ‘liquidity trap’ and other misadventures with Keynes
Lance Taylor
Abstract
Open-access reader
Lance Taylor
Abstract
Open-access reader
In recent blog posts, Paul Krugman proposes a heuristic model to analyse the advanced country macroeconomic situation circa 2014. An earlier version focusing on Japan is much more formalized with the usual New Keynesian paraphernalia. Despite Krugman’s claims to the contrary, the analysis is not really Keynesian, at least in comparison to the General Theory or GT. It does hark back to the world of the turn-of-the-twentieth-century Swedish economist Knut Wicksell and contemporaries and followers such as Irving Fisher, James Tobin, and Robert Mundell.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In recent blog posts, Paul Krugman proposes a heuristic model to analyse the advanced country macroeconomic situation circa 2014. An earlier version focusing on Japan is much more formalized with the usual New Keynesian paraphernalia. Despite Krugman’s claims to the contrary, the analysis is not really Keynesian, at least in comparison to the General Theory or GT. It does hark back to the world of the turn-of-the-twentieth-century Swedish economist Knut Wicksell and contemporaries and followers such as Irving Fisher, James Tobin, and Robert Mundell.
Key concepts: Keynesian economics, Post-Keynesian economics, Economics, Liquidity trap, Neoclassical economics, Market liquidity, Macroeconomics, Monetary economics