1994Archives of Family MedicineRequires access

The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication

Richard Neill

Open publisher page 102 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding electronic mail communication with their family physicians. DESIGN: Mail survey. SETTING: A university-based family practice center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (18 years and older) of full-time faculty physicians at a university-based family practice center who had seen their physicians at lease once in the 10-month period between July 1, 1992, and April 30, 1993 (N = 4094). Subjects were eligible for participation if both they and their physicians had an electronic mail address at the University of Kentucky, Lexington (n = 117). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding the utility of electronic mail as a means of patient-physician communication. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 74% (n = 87). Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was positively perceived by patients for whom electronic mail was accessible Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was perceived to increase speed, convenience, and access to medical care. Electronic mail communication was perceived to be good for simple and nonurgent problems, such as refilling prescriptions, communicating laboratory results, and making appointments. Ninety percent of the patients who had corresponded with their physicians via electronic mail used the medium to discuss a medical problem. CONCLUSIONS: Although electronic mail is not presently in wide use for patient-physician communication, there is great potential for its widespread acceptance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding electronic mail communication with their family physicians. DESIGN: Mail survey. SETTING: A university-based family practice center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (18 years and older) of full-time faculty physicians at a university-based family practice center who had seen their physicians at lease once in the 10-month period between July 1, 1992, and April 30, 1993 (N = 4094). Subjects were eligible for participation if both they and their physicians had an electronic mail address at the University of Kentucky, Lexington (n = 117). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding the utility of electronic mail as a means of patient-physician communication. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 74% (n = 87). Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was positively perceived by patients for whom electronic mail was accessible Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was perceived to increase speed, convenience, and access to medical care. Electronic mail communication was perceived to be good for simple and nonurgent problems, such as refilling prescriptions, communicating laboratory results, and making appointments. Ninety percent of the patients who had corresponded with their physicians via electronic mail used the medium to discuss a medical problem. CONCLUSIONS: Although electronic mail is not presently in wide use for patient-physician communication, there is great potential for its widespread acceptance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 102 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding electronic mail communication with their family physicians. DESIGN: Mail survey. SETTING: A university-based family practice center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (18 years and older) of full-time faculty physicians at a university-based family practice center who had seen their physicians at lease once in the 10-month period between July 1, 1992, and April 30, 1993 (N = 4094). Subjects were eligible for participation if both they and their physicians had an electronic mail address at the University of Kentucky, Lexington (n = 117). INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported knowledge, use, and attitudes regarding the utility of electronic mail as a means of patient-physician communication. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 74% (n = 87). Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was positively perceived by patients for whom electronic mail was accessible Patient-physician communication via electronic mail was perceived to increase speed, convenience, and access to medical care. Electronic mail communication was perceived to be good for simple and nonurgent problems, such as refilling prescriptions, communicating laboratory results, and making appointments. Ninety percent of the patients who had corresponded with their physicians via electronic mail used the medium to discuss a medical problem. CONCLUSIONS: Although electronic mail is not presently in wide use for patient-physician communication, there is great potential for its widespread acceptance.

Key concepts: Medicine, Electronic communication, Electronic mail, Family medicine, Medical prescription, Nursing, Internet privacy, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The utility of electronic mail as a medium for patient-physician communication — Research Paper | ScholarLens