1995Clinical Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Susceptibility Results for the Bacteroides fragilis Group: Comparison of the Broth Microdilution and Agar Dilution Methods

David W. Hecht, L. Lederer, James R. Osmolski

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The antimicrobial susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared using the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. A total of 455 B. fragilis group isolates were tested against 10 antibiotics. Significant disparity in susceptibility results for most antibiotics was observed between the two methods. Broth microdilution susceptibility results were most similar to agar dilution results when a twofold lower breakpoint was used. In addition, broth microdilution failed to detect resistance to some antibiotics when the recommended agar dilution breakpoint was used. MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC values for broth microdilution were consistently twofold to fourfold less than those for agar dilution. Susceptibilities of Bacteroides that are determined with use of broth microdilution may more accurately correspond to those determined with use of agar dilution if lower breakpoints are used for interpretation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The antimicrobial susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared using the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. A total of 455 B. fragilis group isolates were tested against 10 antibiotics. Significant disparity in susceptibility results for most antibiotics was observed between the two methods. Broth microdilution susceptibility results were most similar to agar dilution results when a twofold lower breakpoint was used. In addition, broth microdilution failed to detect resistance to some antibiotics when the recommended agar dilution breakpoint was used. MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC values for broth microdilution were consistently twofold to fourfold less than those for agar dilution. Susceptibilities of Bacteroides that are determined with use of broth microdilution may more accurately correspond to those determined with use of agar dilution if lower breakpoints are used for interpretation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The antimicrobial susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared using the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. A total of 455 B. fragilis group isolates were tested against 10 antibiotics. Significant disparity in susceptibility results for most antibiotics was observed between the two methods. Broth microdilution susceptibility results were most similar to agar dilution results when a twofold lower breakpoint was used. In addition, broth microdilution failed to detect resistance to some antibiotics when the recommended agar dilution breakpoint was used. MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC values for broth microdilution were consistently twofold to fourfold less than those for agar dilution. Susceptibilities of Bacteroides that are determined with use of broth microdilution may more accurately correspond to those determined with use of agar dilution if lower breakpoints are used for interpretation.

Key concepts: Agar dilution, Broth microdilution, Bacteroides fragilis, Agar, Microbiology, Agar Dilution Method, Antibiotics, Dilution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Susceptibility Results for the Bacteroides fragilis Group: Comparison of the Broth Microdilution and Agar Dilution Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens