THE SENSITIVITY OF INTERNATIONAL POVERTY COMPARISONS
McKinley L. Blackburn
Abstract
McKinley L. Blackburn
Abstract
Using data from the Luxembourg Income Study, I study the sensitivity of cross‐national income poverty comparisons to the method in which poverty is measured. Absolute poverty comparisons that keep the purchasing power at the poverty line constant across countries lead to conclusions that differ from relative poverty comparisons in which the real value of the poverty line varies with average income. The absolute poverty ranking of countries also varies as the real value of the poverty line is lowered. Cross‐national differences in household characteristics are largely irrelevant in explaining poverty differences.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Using data from the Luxembourg Income Study, I study the sensitivity of cross‐national income poverty comparisons to the method in which poverty is measured. Absolute poverty comparisons that keep the purchasing power at the poverty line constant across countries lead to conclusions that differ from relative poverty comparisons in which the real value of the poverty line varies with average income. The absolute poverty ranking of countries also varies as the real value of the poverty line is lowered. Cross‐national differences in household characteristics are largely irrelevant in explaining poverty differences.
Key concepts: Poverty, Purchasing power, Economics, Ranking (information retrieval), Extreme poverty, Value (mathematics), Basic needs, Development economics