1991•GeologyRequires access

Kinematics of the plate boundaries between Eurasia, Iberia, and Africa in the North Atlantic from the Late Cretaceous to the present

W. R. Roest, Shubhangi Srivastava

Open publisher page 302 citations

Abstract

The plate kinematic model for Iberia proposed recently by Srivastava et al. is extended here to demonstrate that the implied motions along the plate boundaries between Eurasia, Iberia, and Africa are consistent with geological observations. Additional sea-floor-spreading data were used to obtain a more precise timing of the jumps that took place in the plate boundary between Africa and Eurasia. We show that the model is consistent with the existence of anomaly 34 in the Bay of Biscay, and we give more exact limits for the location of boundary B, which was the plate boundary between Eurasia and Africa from chron 34 to about chron 17. The additional data provide evidence that Iberia must have acted as an independent plate from about chron 18 to chron 6c; King9s Trough was the plate boundary between Iberia and Eurasia for most of this period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The plate kinematic model for Iberia proposed recently by Srivastava et al. is extended here to demonstrate that the implied motions along the plate boundaries between Eurasia, Iberia, and Africa are consistent with geological observations. Additional sea-floor-spreading data were used to obtain a more precise timing of the jumps that took place in the plate boundary between Africa and Eurasia. We show that the model is consistent with the existence of anomaly 34 in the Bay of Biscay, and we give more exact limits for the location of boundary B, which was the plate boundary between Eurasia and Africa from chron 34 to about chron 17. The additional data provide evidence that Iberia must have acted as an independent plate from about chron 18 to chron 6c; King9s Trough was the plate boundary between Iberia and Eurasia for most of this period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 302 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The plate kinematic model for Iberia proposed recently by Srivastava et al. is extended here to demonstrate that the implied motions along the plate boundaries between Eurasia, Iberia, and Africa are consistent with geological observations. Additional sea-floor-spreading data were used to obtain a more precise timing of the jumps that took place in the plate boundary between Africa and Eurasia. We show that the model is consistent with the existence of anomaly 34 in the Bay of Biscay, and we give more exact limits for the location of boundary B, which was the plate boundary between Eurasia and Africa from chron 34 to about chron 17. The additional data provide evidence that Iberia must have acted as an independent plate from about chron 18 to chron 6c; King9s Trough was the plate boundary between Iberia and Eurasia for most of this period.

Key concepts: Geology, Cretaceous, Kinematics, Paleontology, Classical mechanics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Kinematics of the plate boundaries between Eurasia, Iberia, and Africa in the North Atlantic from the Late Cretaceous to the present — Research Paper | ScholarLens