1995Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Reevaluation of the accuracy of NIST photmask linewidth standards

James E. Potzick

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Every artifact measurement standard has some uncertainty associated with its calibration, and the NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards are no exception. The methods of estimating measurement uncertainty, however, and the interpretation of its meaning, have been subjects of discussion for many years. The International organization for Standardization (ISO) has recently published a Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, which outlines an operational procedure for estimating and combining the effects of the various contributing factors. A new NIST policy on measurement uncertainty has led to a change in the method of determining the uncertainty of NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards to comply with ISO recommendations. Consequently, their calibration uncertainty has changed. The new method of evaluating systematic components leads to increased systematic uncertainty, and the new method of combining uncertainty components leads to reduced calibration uncertainty. This paper describes the old and new methods and compares their results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Every artifact measurement standard has some uncertainty associated with its calibration, and the NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards are no exception. The methods of estimating measurement uncertainty, however, and the interpretation of its meaning, have been subjects of discussion for many years. The International organization for Standardization (ISO) has recently published a Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, which outlines an operational procedure for estimating and combining the effects of the various contributing factors. A new NIST policy on measurement uncertainty has led to a change in the method of determining the uncertainty of NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards to comply with ISO recommendations. Consequently, their calibration uncertainty has changed. The new method of evaluating systematic components leads to increased systematic uncertainty, and the new method of combining uncertainty components leads to reduced calibration uncertainty. This paper describes the old and new methods and compares their results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Every artifact measurement standard has some uncertainty associated with its calibration, and the NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards are no exception. The methods of estimating measurement uncertainty, however, and the interpretation of its meaning, have been subjects of discussion for many years. The International organization for Standardization (ISO) has recently published a Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, which outlines an operational procedure for estimating and combining the effects of the various contributing factors. A new NIST policy on measurement uncertainty has led to a change in the method of determining the uncertainty of NIST Photomask Linewidth Standards to comply with ISO recommendations. Consequently, their calibration uncertainty has changed. The new method of evaluating systematic components leads to increased systematic uncertainty, and the new method of combining uncertainty components leads to reduced calibration uncertainty. This paper describes the old and new methods and compares their results.

Key concepts: NIST, Measurement uncertainty, Calibration, Metrology, Standardization, Uncertainty analysis, Computer science, Standard uncertainty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reevaluation of the accuracy of NIST photmask linewidth standards — Research Paper | ScholarLens