1996•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Pitch discrimination during breathy phonation

Daniel H.S. Silverman

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Just-noticeable differences (jnd’s) for frequency of complex waves with stable F0 are 0.3–0.5 Hz [Flanagan and Salow (1958)]. However, there are both articulatory and acoustic reasons to believe that jnd’s are greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. This study investigated pitch discrimination during breathy phonation by manipulating acoustic parameters. Both breathy vowels and modal vowels from Mazatec were digitized. Intensity was equalized, and F0 was manipulated by 0.2-Hz increments employing the OCEAN Speech Processing Program, while all other acoustic parameters were held constant. Subjects listened to pairs of these stimuli and judged whether they were the same or different. It is predicted that jnd’s would be greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. Results will be discussed with reference to laryngeal timing patterns in vowels in Mazatec and elsewhere. In Mazatec, tone and breathy phonation are sequenced with respect to each other on a single vowel. In languages that possess phonation contrasts without tonal contrasts [e.g., Gujarati: Fischer-Jorgensen (1971)], no sequencing is observed: breathiness pervades the vowel. It is likely that pitch discrimination plays a contributing role in such timing distinctions between Mazatec-type languages and Gujarati-type languages: Pitch is likely to be less discriminable during breathy phonation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Just-noticeable differences (jnd’s) for frequency of complex waves with stable F0 are 0.3–0.5 Hz [Flanagan and Salow (1958)]. However, there are both articulatory and acoustic reasons to believe that jnd’s are greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. This study investigated pitch discrimination during breathy phonation by manipulating acoustic parameters. Both breathy vowels and modal vowels from Mazatec were digitized. Intensity was equalized, and F0 was manipulated by 0.2-Hz increments employing the OCEAN Speech Processing Program, while all other acoustic parameters were held constant. Subjects listened to pairs of these stimuli and judged whether they were the same or different. It is predicted that jnd’s would be greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. Results will be discussed with reference to laryngeal timing patterns in vowels in Mazatec and elsewhere. In Mazatec, tone and breathy phonation are sequenced with respect to each other on a single vowel. In languages that possess phonation contrasts without tonal contrasts [e.g., Gujarati: Fischer-Jorgensen (1971)], no sequencing is observed: breathiness pervades the vowel. It is likely that pitch discrimination plays a contributing role in such timing distinctions between Mazatec-type languages and Gujarati-type languages: Pitch is likely to be less discriminable during breathy phonation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Just-noticeable differences (jnd’s) for frequency of complex waves with stable F0 are 0.3–0.5 Hz [Flanagan and Salow (1958)]. However, there are both articulatory and acoustic reasons to believe that jnd’s are greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. This study investigated pitch discrimination during breathy phonation by manipulating acoustic parameters. Both breathy vowels and modal vowels from Mazatec were digitized. Intensity was equalized, and F0 was manipulated by 0.2-Hz increments employing the OCEAN Speech Processing Program, while all other acoustic parameters were held constant. Subjects listened to pairs of these stimuli and judged whether they were the same or different. It is predicted that jnd’s would be greater during breathy phonation than during modal phonation. Results will be discussed with reference to laryngeal timing patterns in vowels in Mazatec and elsewhere. In Mazatec, tone and breathy phonation are sequenced with respect to each other on a single vowel. In languages that possess phonation contrasts without tonal contrasts [e.g., Gujarati: Fischer-Jorgensen (1971)], no sequencing is observed: breathiness pervades the vowel. It is likely that pitch discrimination plays a contributing role in such timing distinctions between Mazatec-type languages and Gujarati-type languages: Pitch is likely to be less discriminable during breathy phonation.

Key concepts: Phonation, Breathy voice, Vowel, Acoustics, Audiology, Modal, Tone (literature), Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pitch discrimination during breathy phonation — Research Paper | ScholarLens