2011American Journal of RoentgenologyRequires access

Utility of CT-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Skeletal Lesions in Patients With Known Primary Malignancies

Glen A. Toomayan, Nancy M. Major

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with a known primary malignancy and one or more suspicious skeletal lesions are often assumed to have skeletal involvement by the known malignancy. We set out to determine how often one would be correct in making this assumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All CT-guided bone biopsies performed at our institution between January 2006 and January 2009 in patients with a history of a single biopsy-proven malignancy were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology results were assigned to one of three outcomes: skeletal involvement by known malignancy, newly diagnosed malignancy, or no malignancy identified. Patients categorized as no malignancy identified required repeat biopsy or stability on follow-up imaging for confirmation. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with a known primary malignancy, 11 were excluded. Of the 93 included patients, there was skeletal involvement by the known malignancy in 82 (88%), a newly diagnosed malignancy in seven (8%), and no malignancy identified in four (4%). CONCLUSION: Biopsy of a suspicious skeletal lesion in a patient with a solitary known malignancy reveals a newly diagnosed malignancy or no evidence of malignancy in 12% of patients, emphasizing the importance of biopsy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Patients with a known primary malignancy and one or more suspicious skeletal lesions are often assumed to have skeletal involvement by the known malignancy. We set out to determine how often one would be correct in making this assumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All CT-guided bone biopsies performed at our institution between January 2006 and January 2009 in patients with a history of a single biopsy-proven malignancy were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology results were assigned to one of three outcomes: skeletal involvement by known malignancy, newly diagnosed malignancy, or no malignancy identified. Patients categorized as no malignancy identified required repeat biopsy or stability on follow-up imaging for confirmation. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with a known primary malignancy, 11 were excluded. Of the 93 included patients, there was skeletal involvement by the known malignancy in 82 (88%), a newly diagnosed malignancy in seven (8%), and no malignancy identified in four (4%). CONCLUSION: Biopsy of a suspicious skeletal lesion in a patient with a solitary known malignancy reveals a newly diagnosed malignancy or no evidence of malignancy in 12% of patients, emphasizing the importance of biopsy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with a known primary malignancy and one or more suspicious skeletal lesions are often assumed to have skeletal involvement by the known malignancy. We set out to determine how often one would be correct in making this assumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All CT-guided bone biopsies performed at our institution between January 2006 and January 2009 in patients with a history of a single biopsy-proven malignancy were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology results were assigned to one of three outcomes: skeletal involvement by known malignancy, newly diagnosed malignancy, or no malignancy identified. Patients categorized as no malignancy identified required repeat biopsy or stability on follow-up imaging for confirmation. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with a known primary malignancy, 11 were excluded. Of the 93 included patients, there was skeletal involvement by the known malignancy in 82 (88%), a newly diagnosed malignancy in seven (8%), and no malignancy identified in four (4%). CONCLUSION: Biopsy of a suspicious skeletal lesion in a patient with a solitary known malignancy reveals a newly diagnosed malignancy or no evidence of malignancy in 12% of patients, emphasizing the importance of biopsy.

Key concepts: Malignancy, Medicine, Biopsy, Radiology, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Utility of CT-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Skeletal Lesions in Patients With Known Primary Malignancies — Research Paper | ScholarLens