Multiplexing optical sensors using a spatial light modulator
John Walker, R Holmes, G.R. Jones, Richard V. Smith
Abstract
John Walker, R Holmes, G.R. Jones, Richard V. Smith
Abstract
The advantages of using spatial light modulators (SLMs) as the multiplexing elements are that low crosstalk levels and high signal to noise ratios (SNR) are attainable. In addition, a substantial number of sensors can be incorporated in the network without serious loss in performance. SLMs are flexible multiplexers which allow a range of multiplexing methods to be used. In this paper time division multiplexing (TDM), frequency division multiplexing (FDM), and code division multiplexing (CDM) are considered. The advantages and limitations of the three multiplexing systems are discussed and their relative performances are compared. The paper concludes with a report on a network incorporating twelve discrete strain sensors using TDM for which the average SNR was 60 dB and the average crosstalk level was better than -70 dB.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The advantages of using spatial light modulators (SLMs) as the multiplexing elements are that low crosstalk levels and high signal to noise ratios (SNR) are attainable. In addition, a substantial number of sensors can be incorporated in the network without serious loss in performance. SLMs are flexible multiplexers which allow a range of multiplexing methods to be used. In this paper time division multiplexing (TDM), frequency division multiplexing (FDM), and code division multiplexing (CDM) are considered. The advantages and limitations of the three multiplexing systems are discussed and their relative performances are compared. The paper concludes with a report on a network incorporating twelve discrete strain sensors using TDM for which the average SNR was 60 dB and the average crosstalk level was better than -70 dB.
Key concepts: Multiplexing, Multiplexer, Time-division multiplexing, Statistical time division multiplexing, Crosstalk, Frequency-division multiplexing, Electronic engineering, Polarization-division multiplexing