1984•Social Studies of ScienceRequires access

The Social History of British Science: After the Harvest?

DAVID PHILIP MILLER

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Not too long ago social history was regarded as, and arguably was, a rather effete enterprise feeding on the crumbs dropped at the feast of mainstream political, economic and intellectual history. If social history per se was rather quaint or lacking in coherence, the idea of a social history of science was beyond the pale. The situation today is very different, of course. Social history has joined the pantheon of respectable historical endeavour, not as part of history (let alone the residuum) but as 'all history from the social point of view'.' And the social history of science has become sufficiently visible to arouse the concern of some historians of science that their subject is in danger of losing its science.2 Nevertheless, the study of science as a social institution is here to stay, sustained not only by historical concerns but by contemporary interest in the relationship between the social, economic and political changes wrought by, and reflected in, modern science and technology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Not too long ago social history was regarded as, and arguably was, a rather effete enterprise feeding on the crumbs dropped at the feast of mainstream political, economic and intellectual history. If social history per se was rather quaint or lacking in coherence, the idea of a social history of science was beyond the pale. The situation today is very different, of course. Social history has joined the pantheon of respectable historical endeavour, not as part of history (let alone the residuum) but as 'all history from the social point of view'.' And the social history of science has become sufficiently visible to arouse the concern of some historians of science that their subject is in danger of losing its science.2 Nevertheless, the study of science as a social institution is here to stay, sustained not only by historical concerns but by contemporary interest in the relationship between the social, economic and political changes wrought by, and reflected in, modern science and technology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Not too long ago social history was regarded as, and arguably was, a rather effete enterprise feeding on the crumbs dropped at the feast of mainstream political, economic and intellectual history. If social history per se was rather quaint or lacking in coherence, the idea of a social history of science was beyond the pale. The situation today is very different, of course. Social history has joined the pantheon of respectable historical endeavour, not as part of history (let alone the residuum) but as 'all history from the social point of view'.' And the social history of science has become sufficiently visible to arouse the concern of some historians of science that their subject is in danger of losing its science.2 Nevertheless, the study of science as a social institution is here to stay, sustained not only by historical concerns but by contemporary interest in the relationship between the social, economic and political changes wrought by, and reflected in, modern science and technology.

Key concepts: Social history (medicine), Mainstream, Politics, Political history, History of science, Institution, Sociology, Subject (documents)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Social History of British Science: After the Harvest? — Research Paper | ScholarLens