2015RetinaRequires access

TREATMENT OF EXUDATIVE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION WITH RANIBIZUMAB COMBINED WITH KETOROLAC EYEDROPS OR PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY

Francesco Semeraro, Andrea Lyn Russo, Luisa Delcassi, Mario Rosario Romano, Michele Rinaldi, Flavia Chiosi, Ciro Costagliola

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ketorolac eyedrops plus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or verteporfin photodynamic therapy plus IVR provides additional benefit over IVR monotherapy for treatment of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, pilot study in 75 patients with naive choroidal neovascularization. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into 3 groups: ranibizumab monotherapy (RM), ranibizumab plus ketorolac, or ranibizumab plus loading-phase reduced-fluence verteporfin photodynamic therapy (RV) groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, all groups showed significant improvement in both best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. The mean best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to 12 months was -0.14 ± 0.52 logMAR (20/73 ± 20/29), -0.25 ± 0.60 logMAR (20/46 ± 20/27), and -0.10 ± 0.30 (20/97 ± 20/40) logMAR in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. The mean central retinal thickness change from baseline to 12 months was -125 ± 15 μm, -141 ± 21 μm, and -130 ± 15 μm in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. Both ranibizumab plus ketorolac and RV groups required fewer IVR treatments than RM. CONCLUSION: Compared with RM and ranibizumab plus verteporfin photodynamic therapy, the combination of 0.45% ketorolac eyedrops 3 times a day and ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization provided superior best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness outcomes. Both combination regimens required fewer IVR injections than RM during the 12-month follow-up period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ketorolac eyedrops plus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or verteporfin photodynamic therapy plus IVR provides additional benefit over IVR monotherapy for treatment of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, pilot study in 75 patients with naive choroidal neovascularization. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into 3 groups: ranibizumab monotherapy (RM), ranibizumab plus ketorolac, or ranibizumab plus loading-phase reduced-fluence verteporfin photodynamic therapy (RV) groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, all groups showed significant improvement in both best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. The mean best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to 12 months was -0.14 ± 0.52 logMAR (20/73 ± 20/29), -0.25 ± 0.60 logMAR (20/46 ± 20/27), and -0.10 ± 0.30 (20/97 ± 20/40) logMAR in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. The mean central retinal thickness change from baseline to 12 months was -125 ± 15 μm, -141 ± 21 μm, and -130 ± 15 μm in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. Both ranibizumab plus ketorolac and RV groups required fewer IVR treatments than RM. CONCLUSION: Compared with RM and ranibizumab plus verteporfin photodynamic therapy, the combination of 0.45% ketorolac eyedrops 3 times a day and ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization provided superior best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness outcomes. Both combination regimens required fewer IVR injections than RM during the 12-month follow-up period.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether ketorolac eyedrops plus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or verteporfin photodynamic therapy plus IVR provides additional benefit over IVR monotherapy for treatment of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, pilot study in 75 patients with naive choroidal neovascularization. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into 3 groups: ranibizumab monotherapy (RM), ranibizumab plus ketorolac, or ranibizumab plus loading-phase reduced-fluence verteporfin photodynamic therapy (RV) groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, all groups showed significant improvement in both best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. The mean best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to 12 months was -0.14 ± 0.52 logMAR (20/73 ± 20/29), -0.25 ± 0.60 logMAR (20/46 ± 20/27), and -0.10 ± 0.30 (20/97 ± 20/40) logMAR in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. The mean central retinal thickness change from baseline to 12 months was -125 ± 15 μm, -141 ± 21 μm, and -130 ± 15 μm in RM, ranibizumab plus ketorolac, and RV groups, respectively. Both ranibizumab plus ketorolac and RV groups required fewer IVR treatments than RM. CONCLUSION: Compared with RM and ranibizumab plus verteporfin photodynamic therapy, the combination of 0.45% ketorolac eyedrops 3 times a day and ranibizumab in patients with choroidal neovascularization provided superior best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness outcomes. Both combination regimens required fewer IVR injections than RM during the 12-month follow-up period.

Key concepts: Ketorolac, Photodynamic therapy, Ranibizumab, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Exudative age-related macular degeneration, Macular degeneration, Verteporfin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TREATMENT OF EXUDATIVE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION WITH RANIBIZUMAB COMBINED WITH KETOROLAC EYEDROPS OR PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY — Research Paper | ScholarLens